![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Windows xp HE I would like to know how/why the new messenger upgrade is always running in the background whether or not I set it to run on bootup. It is very undesireable to be visible to all of my contacts just because I connect to the internet. The only time I want to receive messages from my contacts is when I intentionally launch messenger. How can this designed behavior be stopped without removing this version of msnmessenger? These kind of stealthy services running without informing the user are unethical, in my opinion. Am I mistaken, or was this new behavior ever mentioned before the installation ran? This auto-run does not appear in either the msconfig startup items nor the Start Menu/Startup folders. Why is it buried in user account management, passport.NET jargon???? Even after removing the .NET logon it is still a running processes. Why? Thanks | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) | ||||||
| Well, Lo, and behold! That background running of MS messenger after removal of the Passport.NET signon account was NOT the program design, it was the glitch that John pointed out, caused by Norton AntiVirus 2003. Norton AV was the culprit that was launching msmsgr as a process running in the background. Thanks again, John "win98se" <win98se@nowhere.net> wrote in message news:e6rqgC1SDHA.2020@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||||||
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Background | daveuk | Windows Vista Mail | 1 | 08-31-2006 11:59 AM |
| E-mail with .mp3 background sound | Darrell | Windows Vista Mail | 4 | 07-17-2006 01:37 AM |
| apps running | jon | Windows Vista Games | 2 | 06-10-2006 06:06 AM |
| MSN Messenger Background | Inferno | Windows XP Messenger | 4 | 07-15-2003 08:45 AM |
| Messenger 6 resetting pic/background | TMB | Windows XP Messenger | 1 | 07-10-2003 10:34 PM |