Do I need DX9 on a DAW that only uses VST's ?

Posted: 02-16-2004, 03:50 AM
Not sure if this is the right forum or not...

With Logic Platinum 5.5.1 and TC's Powercore in
Windows XP Pro (SP1), I'm only using VST plug-ins
or Logic's native ones.

If I'm not using DirectX plug-ins, is there any benefit
in installing the latest DirectX 9.0b rather than carry
on with the default 8.1 in XP ?

Are there any system benefits or improvements in audio
handling
with DX9 that would make the update worthwhile?

My ATI graphics card is only DX8 capable but I don't
use it for games - just running an audio workstation
here.

Cheers,
Laz
Reply With Quote

Responses to "Do I need DX9 on a DAW that only uses VST's ?"

plectrum
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Do I need DX9 on a DAW that only uses VST's ?
Posted: 02-16-2004, 06:51 PM
"Lazarus" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:110d301c3f43f$f96552f0$a501280a@phx.gbl...
> Not sure if this is the right forum or not...
>
> With Logic Platinum 5.5.1 and TC's Powercore in
> Windows XP Pro (SP1), I'm only using VST plug-ins
> or Logic's native ones.
>
> If I'm not using DirectX plug-ins, is there any benefit
> in installing the latest DirectX 9.0b rather than carry
> on with the default 8.1 in XP ?
As you wish, but 9b is more stable and optimised.

>
> Are there any system benefits or improvements in audio
> handling
> with DX9 that would make the update worthwhile?
>
Get it as part of your standard XP updates.
> My ATI graphics card is only DX8 capable but I don't
> use it for games - just running an audio workstation
> here.
>
No problem, 9b is backward compatible.
> Cheers,
> Laz

Reply With Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump