Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next

Does virtualization imply no ACCESS_DENIED errors ?

Posted: 03-07-2006, 08:47 AM
Hello,

From Vista documentation, it seems whenever an application tries to write
inside a protected part of the filesystem, virtualization will kick in and
the write would succeed, through redirection. Does that mean all writes
inside "Program Files" etc. would always succeed, and the application in
question would never get the ACCESS_DENIED error it deserves ? Wouldn't
that prevent developers/testers from finding out such problems in the first
place ?

If virtualization is only meant for "legacy applications", how would Vista
decide whether an application is a legacy software (and therefore
virtualization should kick in), or a Vista compatible one (so it should get
the ACCESS_DENIED error) ?

Thanks,
Saurav.


Reply With Quote

Responses to "Does virtualization imply no ACCESS_DENIED errors ?"

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
File Virtualization (VirtualStore) Non-functional Brent Windows Vista File Management 1 03-23-2007 02:31 PM
File Locations to Avoid Virtualization Wayne Hartell Windows Vista File Management 6 01-28-2007 01:30 AM
File locking errors Freek Versteijn Windows Vista File Management 1 06-18-2006 01:24 PM
DNS errors in Vista (5308) Morten Petteroe Windows Vista Networking & Sharing 2 03-18-2006 08:12 AM
Getting Any Port 80 Errors? Daron Brewood \(MVP\) Windows Vista Mail 2 03-05-2006 12:09 PM