grant or deny this application permission to use this key prompt

"Michael" <Michael@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:A6F8C06F-F1FA-47ED-A52F-D87847737FC0@microsoft.com...

> Is there a way to disable this prompt?
> Every time you send or recieve email with digital signatures or
> encryption.
> I understand why you would prompt but it gets old.

Sounds like when you imported the PFX file, or when you created this
certificate, you opted to enable strong private key protection.

You might be able to get around this by re-importing the PFX file and not
checking this option, or by exporting the certificate to a PFX file and
re-importing it - I haven't tested this, so I don't know for sure.

Alun.
~~~~

I figured out how to correct this problem, Don't use outlook to import the
cert. instead in VISTA, double click on the cert, then VISTA will add it to
the OS and Outlook will not prompt you to use the cert again



"Michael" <Michael@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:6CB5AB5C-C083-4F04-B3E1-B43D0F2EAD00@microsoft.com...

> Well my only options where medium or strong, I left it at default of
> medium.
>
> "Alun Jones" wrote:
>

Hey thanks, I will try it to see if I get the same results.

"Harry Storey" wrote:

> I figured out how to correct this problem, Don't use outlook to import the
> cert. instead in VISTA, double click on the cert, then VISTA will add it to
> the OS and Outlook will not prompt you to use the cert again
>
>
>
> "Michael" <Michael@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:6CB5AB5C-C083-4F04-B3E1-B43D0F2EAD00@microsoft.com...

That does it! You the MAN!
As more people use this feature, this will come up more and more.
BTW if you already have this problem...
Export your cert out of IE, options, content, cert, then delete
Then in Outlook, goto tools, trust center, email, settings and delete all
the configs.
Then find the file and double click on it, dont select strong.
Go back in outlook email settings and choose cert that is already there.


"Michael" wrote:

> Hey thanks, I will try it to see if I get the same results.
>
> "Harry Storey" wrote:
>