|
|
> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of Windows
> I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a Subsystem I/O
> activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming that this is a
> kernel design issue, since the OS isn't really Multi-tasking but
> co-operative tasking.
>
> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of Windows
> I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a Subsystem I/O
> activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming that this is a kernel
> design issue, since the OS isn't really Multi-tasking but co-operative
> tasking.
>
> slower than xp
>
> --
>
>
> Gary
>
>
> "anonymouse" <anon@microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:e0aGQqEQGHA.224@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...>> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of>
>> Windows I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a
>> Subsystem I/O activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming
>> that this is a kernel design issue, since the OS isn't really
>> Multi-tasking but co-operative tasking.
>>
>
>I have 3.2 GHz HT and its definitely slow.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "Gary Keramidas" <GKeramidasATmsn.com> wrote in message
> news:utHxIhHQGHA.532@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...>> slower than xp>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> "anonymouse" <anon@microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:e0aGQqEQGHA.224@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...>>> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of>>
>>> Windows I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a
>>> Subsystem I/O activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming
>>> that this is a kernel design issue, since the OS isn't really
>>> Multi-tasking but co-operative tasking.
>>>
>>
>
> Obviously it's slow and all, however I'm probably taking into account the
> fact that performance hasn't been set and Glass does take a lot of stuff
> up. So probably over all... yeh it's slow for what my machine should be
> *-)
>
> --
> Zack Whittaker
> Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor)
> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
> » MSBlog on ResDev: http://msblog.resdev.net
> » ZackNET Forum: www.zacknet.co.uk/forum
> » VistaBase: www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase
> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and
> not
> of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one!
>
>
> --- Original message follows ---
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23qaUb7HQGHA.5560@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...>>I have 3.2 GHz HT and its definitely slow.>
>> --
>> --
>> Andre
>> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>
>> "Gary Keramidas" <GKeramidasATmsn.com> wrote in message
>> news:utHxIhHQGHA.532@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...>>> slower than xp>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> "anonymouse" <anon@microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e0aGQqEQGHA.224@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of
>>>> Windows I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a
>>>> Subsystem I/O activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming
>>>> that this is a kernel design issue, since the OS isn't really
>>>> Multi-tasking but co-operative tasking.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
)> Yeah, and I accept that, Vista won't be optimized for performance until
> around RC1, so I will take it easy on Vista until then.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "Zack Whittaker (R2 Mentor)" <admin@zacknet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:OSGLH9JQGHA.3272@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...>> Obviously it's slow and all, however I'm probably taking into account the>
>> fact that performance hasn't been set and Glass does take a lot of stuff
>> up. So probably over all... yeh it's slow for what my machine should be
>> *-)
>>
>> --
>> Zack Whittaker
>> Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor)
>> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
>> » MSBlog on ResDev: http://msblog.resdev.net
>> » ZackNET Forum: www.zacknet.co.uk/forum
>> » VistaBase: www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase
>> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
>> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and
>> not
>> of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one!
>>
>>
>> --- Original message follows ---
>> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23qaUb7HQGHA.5560@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...>>>I have 3.2 GHz HT and its definitely slow.>>
>>> --
>>> --
>>> Andre
>>> Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com
>>> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
>>> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
>>> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>>>
>>> "Gary Keramidas" <GKeramidasATmsn.com> wrote in message
>>> news:utHxIhHQGHA.532@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>>> slower than xp
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "anonymouse" <anon@microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:e0aGQqEQGHA.224@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>>> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of
>>>>> Windows I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a
>>>>> Subsystem I/O activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming
>>>>> that this is a kernel design issue, since the OS isn't really
>>>>> Multi-tasking but co-operative tasking.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> Obviously it's slow and all, however I'm probably taking into account the
> fact that performance hasn't been set and Glass does take a lot of stuff up.
> So probably over all... yeh it's slow for what my machine should be *-)
>
> --
> Zack Whittaker
> Microsoft Beta (Windows Server R2 Beta Mentor)
> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
> » MSBlog on ResDev: http://msblog.resdev.net
> » ZackNET Forum: www.zacknet.co.uk/forum
> » VistaBase: www.zacknet.co.uk/vistabase
> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
> of my employer, best friend, mother or cat. Let's be clear on that one!
>
>
> --- Original message follows ---
> "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:%23qaUb7HQGHA.5560@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...> >I have 3.2 GHz HT and its definitely slow.>
> > --
> > --
> > Andre
> > Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> > Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> > Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> > http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
> >
> > "Gary Keramidas" <GKeramidasATmsn.com> wrote in message
> > news:utHxIhHQGHA.532@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...> >> slower than xp> >
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >>
> >> "anonymouse" <anon@microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:e0aGQqEQGHA.224@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >>> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of
> >>> Windows I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a
> >>> Subsystem I/O activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming
> >>> that this is a kernel design issue, since the OS isn't really
> >>> Multi-tasking but co-operative tasking.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> I'm particularly interested to know this since all the versions of WindowsIt will be slower on an Intel Core Duo, faster on an AMD Dual Core. Since
> I've used appear to freeze whenever there's a problem with a Subsystem I/O
> activity such as network acces, disk, etc. I'm assuming that this is a
> kernel design issue, since the OS isn't really Multi-tasking but
> co-operative tasking.
>
> It will be slower on an Intel Core Duo, faster on an AMD Dual Core. SinceYep, http://www.neoseeker.com/news/story/5418/
> Intel Core Duo procs cannot talk directly to each other, do not have
> on-die memory controllers, can't have both L2 caches working at the some
> time, have no Hypertransport bus, and have not Direct Connect
> architecture, they cannot run the OS as efficiently.
> FWIW, the Vista Development team is using AMD Athlon64 processors for its
> testbeds...that should tell you something. At the risk of starting a war
> here, AMD X2 and Intel Core Duo are significantly different from each
> other.
Unlike the Core Duo, each execution core is not independently clocked norCheers, Roman
powered, so if one core is doing all the work, that means that the other one
is running at maximum speed and voltage the entire time. With the Core Duo,
each core can adjust itself, depending on the application.
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is it possible to set up a home network and transfer files between a Windows 98 and Vista machine. | Guest | Windows 95/98/Me | 0 | 02-22-2008 11:03 AM |
| Dual OS machine | Michael A. Covington | Windows Vista Install & Setup | 5 | 07-03-2006 04:59 PM |
| Vista machine can't see XP Pro machine in the same network | iric | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 1 | 07-02-2006 04:48 AM |
| can't write to workgroup shares on vista B2 machine | mschatzleinmd | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 15 | 06-26-2006 06:04 AM |
| Vista installation on a Virtual Machine | Dung | Windows Vista Install & Setup | 7 | 06-11-2006 04:49 AM |
Hybrid Mode
Posts: n/a