How many security programs to run...
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
|
|
| abbey |
> I've been running McAfee, Spybot and by default, Windows defender and ranyes, ditch all 3 and just run NIS2007 if it's still available. it scans
> into a problem last week when I downloaded something questionable. I'm not
> sure if it did anything because various scans by the above mentioned programs
> have not turned anything up but I'm concerned.
>
> I ran some of the free checks available from different sources and each
> time, each one finds some new threat, and each scan program finds something
> different than the others. So basically I'm not sure I'm infected or not.
>
> I thought about adding some other programs (ad-aware or spy-sweeper) but am
> wondering if this is overkill.
>
> Any advice?
>
| David |
2955FEE-E69A-447F-9051-0D906A8EFBA2@microsoft.com...> I've been running McAfee, Spybot and by default, Windows defender and ranWhat threats where they?
> into a problem last week when I downloaded something questionable. I'm
> not
> sure if it did anything because various scans by the above mentioned
> programs
> have not turned anything up but I'm concerned.
>
> I ran some of the free checks available from different sources and each
> time, each one finds some new threat, and each scan program finds
> something
> different than the others. So basically I'm not sure I'm infected or not.
> I thought about adding some other programs (ad-aware or spy-sweeper) butIt's recommended to run at least two different anti spy-/adware programs to
> am
> wondering if this is overkill.
| Charlie42 |
>
> "abbey" <abbey@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news2955FEE-E69A-447F-9051-0D906A8EFBA2@microsoft.com...
>> > I've been running McAfee, Spybot and by default, Windows defender and ran>
> > into a problem last week when I downloaded something questionable. I'm
> > not
> > sure if it did anything because various scans by the above mentioned
> > programs
> > have not turned anything up but I'm concerned.
> >
> > I ran some of the free checks available from different sources and each
> > time, each one finds some new threat, and each scan program finds
> > something
> > different than the others. So basically I'm not sure I'm infected or not.
> What threats where they?
>
> What's the name of these tools? I'm asking, because there is some bogus
> "anti spyware" offered on the net that will warn you about "infections" you
> don't have, as a sales pitch.
>> > I thought about adding some other programs (ad-aware or spy-sweeper) but>
> > am
> > wondering if this is overkill.
> It's recommended to run at least two different anti spy-/adware programs to
> complement each other, because a single program will have to low a detection
> rate. I see you have three already (I'm assuming you're running the entire
> McAfee suite here), and you should consider how much more, if any, memory
> and CPU you're willing to spend on this.
>
> Charlie42
>
| abbey |
> Let's see what I ran-I only used things that seemed to be rated decently byVery good; Ensure you download software only from reputable sources. If in
> sources such as CNET. Some of those listed however weren't compatible with
> Vista - at least at the time of the review.
> I did the free one from Kaspersky, also the one from Spysweeper (which willDon't use these apps. anymore; They are nothing but marketing tools
> install and identify for free but not remove unless you subscribe) and tried
> Ewido which for some reason did not complete and wouldn't allow me a second
> chance to install.
> Some of the things detected: odigo, coolwebsearch both of which I have readRe: Odigo; "Odigo Express is a Web-based version of the Odigo Messenger
> to be "real" threats I forgot which one found these: iframeref.gen,
> trojandownloadr, zlobgen
> Like I said, none of the three applications I have installed mentioned these.Good thinking/decision!
> I haven't installed or considered Norton since I've seem to read conflicting
> reviews.

| Kayman |
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:46:01 -0700, abbey wrote:
>> > Let's see what I ran-I only used things that seemed to be rated decently by>
> > sources such as CNET. Some of those listed however weren't compatible with
> > Vista - at least at the time of the review.
> Very good; Ensure you download software only from reputable sources. If in
> doubt - DON'T! Check first in relevant fora and/or ng's.
>> > I did the free one from Kaspersky, also the one from Spysweeper (which will>
> > install and identify for free but not remove unless you subscribe) and tried
> > Ewido which for some reason did not complete and wouldn't allow me a second
> > chance to install.
> Don't use these apps. anymore; They are nothing but marketing tools
> (promotional baits) to pay for something you may not require; Their use can
> be pretty unsafe as well.
>> > Some of the things detected: odigo, coolwebsearch both of which I have read>
> > to be "real" threats I forgot which one found these: iframeref.gen,
> > trojandownloadr, zlobgen
> Re: Odigo; "Odigo Express is a Web-based version of the Odigo Messenger
> that allows you to access your Odigo Friends List and communicate with
> users from any computer ...". Did you install this application? If not get
> rid of it using Revo Uninstaller.
> Re: coolwebsearch; CW Shredder might remove this.
> Re: iframeref.gen and zlobgen; David's MULTI_AV.EXE should take care of
> these.
>> > Like I said, none of the three applications I have installed mentioned these.>
> > I haven't installed or considered Norton since I've seem to read conflicting
> > reviews.
> Good thinking/decision!
>
> Valuable advice from an AV expert, David H. Lipman
> http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
> http://www.ik-cs.com/got-a-virus.htm
>
> Question:
> "Is it advisable to turn off System Restore while cleaning the OS using
> AV/A-S, and if so, when do you turn it off and then on?
> Also is it was recommended to delete all restore point during this
> procedure?"
>
> Answer(David H. Lipman):
> "I used to be convinced that one should dump the System restore cache PRIOR
> to cleaning a system. However after many discussions and based upon
> personal tests and experience, I have come to the conclusion that this
> should be done AFTER a system is cleaned.
>
> Here's the problem. Most malware are binary files that the System Restore
> cache will create a backup of in restore points. When one gets infected,
> copies of the infector are now stored in the System Restore cache. If you
> clean the system then restore to a prior Restore Point that contains
> infectors, the OS become re-infected.
>
> If you clean a PC and don't expect to restore to a previous Restore Point
> then eventually the infected files will cache-out. In that situation, one
> does NOT need to dump the System Restore cache.
>
> If you dump the System Restore cache PRIOR to cleaning the system, you will
> also remove a fall back point. That is, if during the cleanup the system
> becomes unstable, you will not be able to restore the system from a
> previous Restore Point. If you did restore the system
> back to that state, you can clean the system differently such that the
> system won't become unstable and/or unusable. Thus an infected Restore
> Point is better than no Restore Point at all.
>
> Later, when the system is cleaned and verified to be stable, you can then
> dump the System Restore cache, reboot the PC and then re-enable the system
> Restore cache and subsequently manually create an initial Restore Point.
>
> Thus it is better the dump the cache AFTER and not BEFORE the system has
> been cleaned of malware."
>
> Be guided accordingly.
>
> Stimulating thought from Gary S. Terhune MS MVP Shell/User
> http://grystmill.com/articles/cleanboot.htm
> http://grystmill.com/articles/security.htm
>
> "Forget about paid versions, free AV ware are just as efficient and
> reliable!"
> Question:
> "Do you think that the free AV can be really as efficient that the other
> ones?"
> Answer:
> "Absolutely. In fact, when it comes to real efficiency, the ability to scan
> accurately for viruses without getting in the way of the rest of the
> computer's functions, some of the free ones are more efficient than some of
> the most expensive. For instance, Norton and McAfee, and even Trend Micro
> in some packages, are among the most *inefficient* applications out
> there,whereas Avast!, AVG, and other free offerings are among the most
> efficient. After that, it's a question of the definitions used, and whether
> or not they're free has absolutely no bearing on those stats.
> Understand, many of the best offerings are offered to home users for free
> by huge companies that make their money serving business and industry
> clients,and their logic is that the more home machines they can get
> protected,preventing them from becoming zombies that distribute malware,
> the better off business and industry are."
>
> Good luck
>
| abbey |
> Thanks so much for all the help.YW
> There was just too much information to sort through on the web,Such as? You have a problem and received quality advice; Learn to
> and most of it is probably unreliableand did you arrive to that conclusion?
> so I appreciate it!huh?
| Kayman |
> I've been running McAfee, Spybot and by default, Windows defender and ranThe effectiveness of an individual A-S scanners can be wide-ranging and
> into a problem last week when I downloaded something questionable. I'm not
> sure if it did anything because various scans by the above mentioned programs
> have not turned anything up but I'm concerned.
> I ran some of the free checks available from different sources and each
> time, each one finds some new threat, and each scan program finds something
> different than the others. So basically I'm not sure I'm infected or not.
> I thought about adding some other programs (ad-aware or spy-sweeper) but am
> wondering if this is overkill.
> Any advice?
| Kayman |
| abbey |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Security Center shows uninstalled programs | Dougbert | Windows Vista Security | 6 | 04-12-2007 08:10 PM |
| Security Centre wrongly reports dual antivirus programs | Spirefm | Windows Vista Security | 7 | 10-21-2006 05:59 PM |
| Security Programs | muscal | Windows XP Security & Administration | 0 | 09-23-2003 07:13 AM |
| security or private access to programs | Ileen | Windows XP Security & Administration | 0 | 09-05-2003 08:21 PM |
| Placing Security on Download Programs | Emma | Windows XP Security & Administration | 0 | 07-06-2003 10:08 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |


Hybrid Mode


Posts: n/a