Re: Is this Vista mobile device support really this useless?
Posted: 12-29-2006, 07:32 PM
which is below the big picture of a device on the left.
I completely agree with you that WMDC is a disaster. It doesn't
automatically sync. There is no Bluetooth activesync provider, etc. Vert
awkward and clumsy. Maybe the final will make it all good, but the B3
certainly doesn't give on hope. I never thought I'd say this, but "Bring
back Activesync".
"szlevi" <szlevi@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:59C56CD8-8011-4AED-9D35-AFD82F9A3D1E@microsoft.com...
> OK, rant first...
> I don't care if it's an offense but this is clearly ridiculous: with my
> home
> XP Pro when I connect my TyTN via USB and I am immediately able to browse
> my
> phone, transfer files and so on and so forth. (I don't waste time with the
> useless sync functionality - I think the whole ActiveSync by default is a
> completely wrong approach which just got worse with its utterly
> counterintuitive UI, menus and settings but it's just a side issue, I'm
> fine
> as long as direct USB connection works.)
> At work I just upgraded to test drive Vista Ultimate and nothing like this
> happens when I connect my phone. (I upgraded from XP pro which worked the
> same way as my home XP does.) I hear some connection sound and nothing.
> Device doesn't appear, nothing. After few minutes of "nothing" I found
> this
> site - I tried Bluetooth and same result, built-in Help is totally
> worthless
> - and I downloaded and installed WMDC B3. Now I have this Sync Center and
> WMDC but alas, still no device.
> Let's start from basics, I though and I tried to locate what services this
> crap requires - and I learned there's no such help literature whatsoever
> at
> MS.
>
> Now after 15+ minutes I'm out of patience and time - if anybody has any
> good
> idea where to start with this useless crap I'd really appreciate it,
> thanks
> in advance!
>
> PS: As a side note what's beyond me is how on Earth in this much-touted
> "next-gen" and "business OS" basic services like this became not only less
> obvious to use, even less transparent than before but actually more
> complicated and completely not supported in Help files? (Whoever says
> there's
> Help that person has no idea what are these "Help" files contain.)
> I oversee ~200 Windows workstations and servers and it just blows my mind
> how could be this very-very basic thing so counterintuitive, backed with
> this
> useless Help library, how is that this
> click-here-then-click-there-click-here-then-click-there-then-setup-then-push-this-then-wait
> orgy apparently became less meaningful and even more clunky than before...



Linear Mode


Posts: n/a