M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment

Posted: 01-01-2008, 04:01 PM
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= my. response to the harassment -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

My first reaction in 1990/91. was to assume that if I broke contact then
they would. not be able to follow and would lose interest. So I did the
things that have been suggested by other. people; I sold my television,
stopped listening to the radio and. tried to withdraw away from the sources
of abuse as much as. possible. I reasoned that they must have more important
things to deal with and that normal people. would simply leave me alone if
it were made difficult. for them to continue their harassment.

I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of. the abusers. They did not
let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly people. at work, to do
their dirty work for them. I. went to see my GP, who refused to believe what
he was being told, and refused to direct me on. to anyone who could be of
practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed. that the GP
admitted the matter was outside. his competence and suggested going to the
police.

In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance. experts from a
private detective agency to sweep. our house and telephone for bugging
devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing;. but as noted
above, since the existence of surveillance was being forced in my. face by
the harassers, you would expect them to have taken the possibility of. a
counter-surveillance sweep into. account when planning the type of devices
to be. employed.

In Easter 1995 I made a complaint. to my local Police station in London, but
the police have not expressed. any intention to do anything about the
continuing. harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not
saying it isn't happening" were the. words used). I think the officer I
spoke to at. Easter wasn't aware of it happening, although other members of
the police force obviously do. know.

From April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in. a
lot of detail on. the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion
has given birth to. the article which you are now reading. My hopes in
posting to Usenet were that wider publicizing would discourage the. security
services from continuing their harassment, and "draw people. out" into
concurring with. the truth of what was being said. Neither of those have
followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in. allowing this
structured report to be. created.

9692

M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment


Responses to "M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment"

BurrWalnut
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
RE: M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment
Posted: 01-01-2008, 04:26 PM
Come on old chap, stop the excessive posting, you're safe here.


"imvev@yahoo.com" wrote:
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> -= my. response to the harassment -=
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> My first reaction in 1990/91. was to assume that if I broke contact then
> they would. not be able to follow and would lose interest. So I did the
> things that have been suggested by other. people; I sold my television,
> stopped listening to the radio and. tried to withdraw away from the sources
> of abuse as much as. possible. I reasoned that they must have more important
> things to deal with and that normal people. would simply leave me alone if
> it were made difficult. for them to continue their harassment.
>
> I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of. the abusers. They did not
> let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly people. at work, to do
> their dirty work for them. I. went to see my GP, who refused to believe what
> he was being told, and refused to direct me on. to anyone who could be of
> practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed. that the GP
> admitted the matter was outside. his competence and suggested going to the
> police.
>
> In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance. experts from a
> private detective agency to sweep. our house and telephone for bugging
> devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing;. but as noted
> above, since the existence of surveillance was being forced in my. face by
> the harassers, you would expect them to have taken the possibility of. a
> counter-surveillance sweep into. account when planning the type of devices
> to be. employed.
>
> In Easter 1995 I made a complaint. to my local Police station in London, but
> the police have not expressed. any intention to do anything about the
> continuing. harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not
> saying it isn't happening" were the. words used). I think the officer I
> spoke to at. Easter wasn't aware of it happening, although other members of
> the police force obviously do. know.
>
> From April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in. a
> lot of detail on. the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That discussion
> has given birth to. the article which you are now reading. My hopes in
> posting to Usenet were that wider publicizing would discourage the. security
> services from continuing their harassment, and "draw people. out" into
> concurring with. the truth of what was being said. Neither of those have
> followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in. allowing this
> structured report to be. created.
>
> 9692
>
>
Peter
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment
Posted: 01-01-2008, 08:20 PM
He's just a nuisance spammer

--
Peter
Toronto, Canada
XP Pro SP3 Beta/Vista Ultimate SP1 Beta
Anyone using yahoo.com,
bigfoot.com or lycos.com
as their posted address
will have their posts obliterated
due to newsgroup spam.
"BurrWalnut" <BurrWalnut@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:7B3B7A07-915E-4B12-8C0F-9F1F307E7225@microsoft.com...
> Come on old chap, stop the excessive posting, you're safe here.
>
>
> "imvev@yahoo.com" wrote:
>
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> -= my. response to the harassment -=
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>>
>> My first reaction in 1990/91. was to assume that if I broke contact then
>> they would. not be able to follow and would lose interest. So I did the
>> things that have been suggested by other. people; I sold my television,
>> stopped listening to the radio and. tried to withdraw away from the
>> sources
>> of abuse as much as. possible. I reasoned that they must have more
>> important
>> things to deal with and that normal people. would simply leave me alone
>> if
>> it were made difficult. for them to continue their harassment.
>>
>> I reckoned without the sheer vindictiveness of. the abusers. They did not
>> let up but instead "got to" people around me, mainly people. at work, to
>> do
>> their dirty work for them. I. went to see my GP, who refused to believe
>> what
>> he was being told, and refused to direct me on. to anyone who could be of
>> practical assistance. It was not until three years had passed. that the
>> GP
>> admitted the matter was outside. his competence and suggested going to
>> the
>> police.
>>
>> In the summer of 1994 we called in counter-surveillance. experts from a
>> private detective agency to sweep. our house and telephone for bugging
>> devices. They conducted a thorough search and found nothing;. but as
>> noted
>> above, since the existence of surveillance was being forced in my. face
>> by
>> the harassers, you would expect them to have taken the possibility of. a
>> counter-surveillance sweep into. account when planning the type of
>> devices
>> to be. employed.
>>
>> In Easter 1995 I made a complaint. to my local Police station in London,
>> but
>> the police have not expressed. any intention to do anything about the
>> continuing. harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not
>> saying it isn't happening" were the. words used). I think the officer I
>> spoke to at. Easter wasn't aware of it happening, although other members
>> of
>> the police force obviously do. know.
>>
>> From April 1995 until the present time the matter has been discussed in.
>> a
>> lot of detail on. the Usenet (Internet) "uk.misc" newsgroup. That
>> discussion
>> has given birth to. the article which you are now reading. My hopes in
>> posting to Usenet were that wider publicizing would discourage the.
>> security
>> services from continuing their harassment, and "draw people. out" into
>> concurring with. the truth of what was being said. Neither of those have
>> followed, but the discussion has served a purpose in. allowing this
>> structured report to be. created.
>>
>> 9692
>>
>>
Paul Adare
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment
Posted: 01-01-2008, 08:59 PM
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:20:08 -0500, Peter wrote:
> He's just a nuisance spammer
And quoting the full text of the original garbage in your unnecessary
response accomplishes what exactly?

--
Paul Adare
MVP - Virtual Machines
http://www.identit.ca
Hackers have kernel knowledge.
JDa™©
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment
Posted: 01-02-2008, 05:18 PM
Paul Adare, did transcribed the following::
> On Tue, 1 Jan 2008 15:20:08 -0500, Peter wrote:
>
>
>> He's just a nuisance spammer
>>
>
> And quoting the full text of the original garbage in your unnecessary
> response accomplishes what exactly?
>
>

This person is not paying any attention to any "Re:" post,
He is 'Flooding' all of USENET, using various fake ID's.

He also, does this at least 3 times per year, and started
doing it the early '90s.
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
M I`5,Persecuti on ' my respons e to th e h arassment mefei@yahoo.com Windows XP Configuration & Management 1 01-02-2008 06:38 PM
M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment imvev@yahoo.com Windows Vista File Management 4 01-02-2008 05:18 PM
M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment imvev@yahoo.com Windows Vista Printers & Scanners 4 01-02-2008 05:18 PM
M I-5,Persecutio n my res ponse to th e h arassment imvev@yahoo.com Windows Vista Performance & Maintenance 4 01-02-2008 05:18 PM
M'I`5'Perse cution , my res ponse to the har assment emefmv@hotmail.com Windows XP Photos 0 01-01-2008 03:57 PM