McAfee and Windows Live Mail 8.1

I have McAfee (lastest version) and I wanted to have It scan emails from
WLMail 8.1. Does anyone know how to do it?

"Amrykid" <amrykid@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9FFB2F28-8471-4396-BC6D-60B0DA55C573@microsoft.com...

>I have McAfee (lastest version) and I wanted to have It scan emails from
>WLMail 8.1. Does anyone know how to do it?

Don't ever scan email with any anti-virus. It is redundant and causes
problems.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
http://www.fjsmjs.com
Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email.

Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM wrote:

> "Amrykid" <amrykid@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:9FFB2F28-8471-4396-BC6D-60B0DA55C573@microsoft.com...

>
> Don't ever scan email with any anti-virus. It is redundant and causes
> problems.
>

Ah, now that is the Microsoft we all know and love. The best way to
deal with a threat is to deny it access to what it threatens. Anything
less, risks that threat taking its intended action. I don't want to
wait to have email checked until I open the email. That is not acceptable.

Doesn't anyone in Redmond take security seriously?

--
Iron Feliks

"Feliks Dzerzhinsky" <fdzerzhinsky@kgb.su> wrote in message
news:u3DpHIxbHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM wrote:

> Ah, now that is the Microsoft we all know and love. The best way to
> deal with a threat is to deny it access to what it threatens. Anything
> less, risks that threat taking its intended action. I don't want to
> wait to have email checked until I open the email. That is not
> acceptable.
>
> Doesn't anyone in Redmond take security seriously?

The anti-virus running in its normal resident mode without email scanning
still scans every file you try to open or save. What it does not do is
interpose the proxy responsible for screwing up email.

I don't work for Microsoft.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
http://www.fjsmjs.com
Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email.

And of course you know what you are talking about. Removing the email scanning option is the best thing that you can do to avoid future problems with the email client. Stopping\Disabling the email scanning option does NOT leave your email client unprotected. It is only a layer on top of the actual scan. Your AV without email scanning will still work and keep protecting as it should.

--
Peter

Please Reply to Newsgroup for the benefit of others
Requests for assistance by email can not and will not be acknowledged.

"Feliks Dzerzhinsky" <fdzerzhinsky@kgb.su> wrote in message news:u3DpHIxbHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM wrote:

> Ah, now that is the Microsoft we all know and love. The best way to
> deal with a threat is to deny it access to what it threatens. Anything
> less, risks that threat taking its intended action. I don't want to
> wait to have email checked until I open the email. That is not acceptable.
>
> Doesn't anyone in Redmond take security seriously?
>
> --
> Iron Feliks

"Feliks Dzerzhinsky" <fdzerzhinsky@kgb.su> wrote in message
news:u3DpHIxbHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM wrote:

> Ah, now that is the Microsoft we all know and love. The best way to
> deal with a threat is to deny it access to what it threatens. Anything
> less, risks that threat taking its intended action. I don't want to
> wait to have email checked until I open the email. That is not
> acceptable.
>
> Doesn't anyone in Redmond take security seriously?

Even the AV folks say there is no need to scan email.

--
Rock [MS-MVP User/Shell]

Peter Foldes wrote:

> And of course you know what you are talking about.
>Removing the email scanning option is the best thing
>that you can do to avoid future problems with the email client.
>Stopping\Disabling the email scanning option does NOT leave your
>email client unprotected. It is only a layer on top of the actual scan.
>Your AV without email scanning will still work and keep protecting as

it should.

>

Relying on the last line of defense is fine, only as long as it works.

We have always scanned incoming email and have had no problems. We've
never had a machine infected by a virus and aim to keep it that way.

--
Iron Feliks

"Feliks Dzerzhinsky" <fdzerzhinsky@kgb.su> wrote in message
news:OJs5kF1bHHA.5052@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Relying on the last line of defense is fine, only as long as it works.

Replicating the last line of defence is fine, only as long as it works.

If your virus scanner for email is the same as your active virus scanner,
there's no point in doing the same scan twice.

> We have always scanned incoming email and have had no problems. We've
> never had a machine infected by a virus and aim to keep it that way.

Sure, scan your incoming email - at the mail server, and with a different
virus scanner. That's a great option, if you're a corporation with a
centralised email server and processing resources to spare on scanning
there.

Don't scan your incoming email at the mail client using the same virus
scanner that runs whenever you open a file.

That's just a waste of processor and disk time, and contributes to any
number of problems with duplicated mail, hung sessions, etc.

Alun.
~~~~
--
Texas Imperial Software | Web: http://www.wftpd.com/
23921 57th Ave SE | Blog: http://msmvps.com/alunj/
Woodinville WA 98072-8661 | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
Fax/Voice +1(425)807-1787 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

alun@texis.invalid wrote:

> Don't scan your incoming email at the mail client using the same virus
> scanner that runs whenever you open a file.
>
> That's just a waste of processor and disk time, and contributes to any
> number of problems with duplicated mail, hung sessions, etc.
>
> Alun.
> ~~~~

Scanning incoming email at the client means the user never gets the
opportunity to open the file.



- --
Iron Feliks
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGEJcFIEgejQPpTu4RClkNAJ0VuhA5sSysWA5JnZ5p7d sUnyO5HQCgg+uP
0ut7ZOEuFqeHHXyz2gD8HJY=
=c7Hf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Feliks Dzerzhinsky" <fdzerzhinsky@kgb.su> wrote in message
news:%23qiwAlOdHHA.4216@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> alun@texis.invalid wrote:
>

>
> Scanning incoming email at the client means the user never gets the
> opportunity to open the file.

It also slows down the downloading (or sending) of mail and causes timeouts.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
http://www.fjsmjs.com
Answer in newsgroup. Don't expect an answer to email.