No More Clean Installs Using Upgrade Discs

Thanks for posting the link! Its clear that there is still some incorrect
info out there about upgrade editions but at least the word is getting out
that things have changed since XP so "look before you leap." Even the
article does not give the whole picture, especially with regard to Vista x64
UEs.

"yoshi" <yoshi@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:FCB20898-478E-4131-B085-BC862B0715B6@microsoft.com...

> This article explains there is no more clean installs using upgrade discs
> with Windows Vista.
>
> http://dailytech.com/No+More+Clean+I...rticle5887.htm
>
>
>

I'm hoping someone figures out what files it is looking for so that I can do
a relatively clean install - upgrades are a sloppy way of installing an OS.
Let's hope someone finds those solutions soon as I just bought 5 "upgrades"
not realizing I'd have to install them over previous versions of Windows.
I don't mind giving the program the original install CD or the registered
license for XP but I really dislike sloppy installs. This is incredibly
unprofessional and shows poor geek appreciation on the part of MS in my
opinion

"yoshi" <yoshi@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:FCB20898-478E-4131-B085-BC862B0715B6@microsoft.com...

> This article explains there is no more clean installs using upgrade discs
> with Windows Vista.
>
> http://dailytech.com/No+More+Clean+I...rticle5887.htm
>
>
>

It doesn't "look for files" - Setup must be started from within an existing
Windows session. Period. So your wish will never be fulfilled.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com
* NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm


"boe" <boe_d@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:es91BY2QHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> I'm hoping someone figures out what files it is looking for so that I can
> do a relatively clean install - upgrades are a sloppy way of installing an
> OS. Let's hope someone finds those solutions soon as I just bought 5
> "upgrades" not realizing I'd have to install them over previous versions
> of Windows. I don't mind giving the program the original install CD or the
> registered license for XP but I really dislike sloppy installs. This is
> incredibly unprofessional and shows poor geek appreciation on the part of
> MS in my opinion

Hi,

Use the custom option after starting the disk within an existing
installation to avoid the "sloppy" install. As Richard has stated, the
manner of qualifying an Upgrade disk is not going to change.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"boe" <boe_d@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:es91BY2QHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> I'm hoping someone figures out what files it is looking for so that I can
> do a relatively clean install - upgrades are a sloppy way of installing an
> OS. Let's hope someone finds those solutions soon as I just bought 5
> "upgrades" not realizing I'd have to install them over previous versions
> of Windows. I don't mind giving the program the original install CD or the
> registered license for XP but I really dislike sloppy installs. This is
> incredibly unprofessional and shows poor geek appreciation on the part of
> MS in my opinion
>
> "yoshi" <yoshi@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:FCB20898-478E-4131-B085-BC862B0715B6@microsoft.com...

>> This article explains there is no more clean installs using upgrade discs
>> with Windows Vista.
>>
>> http://dailytech.com/No+More+Clean+I...rticle5887.htm
>>
>>
>>

>
>

Does the custom install option install in the existing XP partition or in a
different Partition?
If in the existing partition what is different between it and an upgrade
when the install is complete?

"Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:eEPOGt5QHHA.3520@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Hi,
>
> Use the custom option after starting the disk within an existing
> installation to avoid the "sloppy" install. As Richard has stated, the
> manner of qualifying an Upgrade disk is not going to change.
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>
> "boe" <boe_d@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:es91BY2QHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> I'm hoping someone figures out what files it is looking for so that I can
>> do a relatively clean install - upgrades are a sloppy way of installing
>> an OS. Let's hope someone finds those solutions soon as I just bought 5
>> "upgrades" not realizing I'd have to install them over previous versions
>> of Windows. I don't mind giving the program the original install CD or
>> the registered license for XP but I really dislike sloppy installs.
>> This is incredibly unprofessional and shows poor geek appreciation on the
>> part of MS in my opinion
>>
>> "yoshi" <yoshi@nospam.com> wrote in message
>> news:FCB20898-478E-4131-B085-BC862B0715B6@microsoft.com...

>>> This article explains there is no more clean installs using upgrade
>>> discs with Windows Vista.
>>>
>>> http://dailytech.com/No+More+Clean+I...rticle5887.htm
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>
>>

>

According to this knowledge base article you cannot do a clean install,
http://support.microsoft.com/default...b/930985/en-us

But according to the information in "Buy or Upgrade", some versions require
a clean install.

http://www.microsoft.com/windows/pro...radepaths.mspx

Which is correct? These seem to contradict each other. Almost everytime I
turn around there seems to be more contradictory information on Vista.

Ryan Nicolson wrote:

> According to this knowledge base article you cannot do a clean install,
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b/930985/en-us
>
> But according to the information in "Buy or Upgrade", some versions require
> a clean install.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/windows/pro...radepaths.mspx
>
> Which is correct? These seem to contradict each other. Almost everytime I
> turn around there seems to be more contradictory information on Vista.

Ain't it the truth. I guess we have no option other than to wait to
hear exactly what happens as thousands more get their 'upgrade' disks in
their hands and report WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED rather than speculation
and links to MS articles. Sad but true...

Hi,

I haven't tried this my self, but I have heard that if you do a clean
install of Vista with the version you have the key for, without entering key
as you install, that you then at point of activation can use the upgrade key
you have received.

Nice if somone can confirm or prove this to be wrong.

RB

"boe" <boe_d@nospam.hotmail.com> skrev i melding
news:es91BY2QHHA.464@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> I'm hoping someone figures out what files it is looking for so that I can
> do a relatively clean install - upgrades are a sloppy way of installing an
> OS. Let's hope someone finds those solutions soon as I just bought 5
> "upgrades" not realizing I'd have to install them over previous versions
> of Windows. I don't mind giving the program the original install CD or the
> registered license for XP but I really dislike sloppy installs. This is
> incredibly unprofessional and shows poor geek appreciation on the part of
> MS in my opinion
>
> "yoshi" <yoshi@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:FCB20898-478E-4131-B085-BC862B0715B6@microsoft.com...

>> This article explains there is no more clean installs using upgrade discs
>> with Windows Vista.
>>
>> http://dailytech.com/No+More+Clean+I...rticle5887.htm
>>
>>
>>

>
>