![]() |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Dear All, As Microsoft have a complete commercial monopoly it is time to break the Product Activation system. MS software prices could be regulated by government e.g. Oftel regulated BT telephone call charges. Or it could be made free for consumer or very heavy price reductions for everyone. As MS has alot money in it's bank account and does little actual development, I propose to put MS product activation codes on the Internet starting with this Windows 95 one ID# 05697-OEM-0019182-74655, please send me your codes and I will post them on alt.destroy.microsoft and put them on www.rebootcampaign.org.uk No I will not give into TPM, Bill. -- The Office of Fair Trading (OFT) should start an investigation into Microsoft's monopoly, http://www.petitiononline.com/oftsucks/ Reboot Movement (An Anti-Wintel Campaign), http://www.rebootmovement.org.uk Court case complete, http://www.windowshaters.co.uk | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| How about this key code: YOUR-ARE-AFULL-BLOWN-IDIOT NotAnOEM "Tarquin Mills" <person@use.net> wrote in message news:5875d53f4e.Usenet@localhost.local... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| Just a couple of things wrong with your message. 1. Windows 95 was never a part of product activation? 2. The number you posted (ID# 05697-OEM-0019182-74655) is not an activation code or even a product key? 3. Yes, Microsoft is a monopoly, but being a monopoly is not a crime. 4. What difference does it make how much money Microsoft has in their bank account? It sounds like your message has more to do with a lot of jealousy toward someone who is successful. Watch out for those black helicopters. -- Ronnie Vernon Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User "Tarquin Mills" <person@use.net> wrote in message news:5875d53f4e.Usenet@localhost.local... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| What a crock of s**t ! For all it's faults, and for all the crap talked about a MS monopoly, Windows is LOVELY ! ( ...except for that stupid Windows Validation registry key that I got rid of, then had to put back in ! ) regards, Richard "Tarquin Mills" <person@use.net> wrote in message news:5875d53f4e.Usenet@localhost.local... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #5 (permalink) | ||
| Ronnie Vernon MVP wrote: Quote:
Quote:
Alias | Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Tarquin Mills wrote: Quote:
What's it like to go through life completely out of touch with reality? i bet you still live with (i.e., sponge off) your parents, don't you? -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -Benjamin Franklin | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #7 (permalink) | |||
| You need to do some more research. -- Ronnie Vernon Microsoft MVP Windows Shell/User "ºAliasº" <not@wga.spyware> wrote in message news:e0AGzuWnGHA.1592@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #8 (permalink) | |||
| ºAliasº wrote: Quote:
the "Clayton Act," or the "Wilson Tariff Act." However, all "trust" acts deal with collusion amongst erstwhile competitors, not monopolies. Even so, being a monoply is not a crime per se, in fact monopolies are explicitly sanctioned and encouraged by the very first Article in the Constitution (Article I, Section 8). Virtually all knowledgeable people agree that monopolies are usually good for the consumer. That's why there's no law against being a monopoly. The arch-monopolist, John D.Rockefeller, drove down the price of kerosene down from $3.00/gallon to five cents in only three years! This was, admittedly, bad for the whale-oil industry, but it lit up America. Microsoft is a practical monopoly, true, but there is a force equally as powerful that serves as a Microsoft competitor: Microsoft itself. Unless Microsoft creates new products, to compete against its existing offerings, the revenue stream essentially becomes a trickle. So why do monopolies have a bad rap then? It's not being a monopoly that's bad -- it's the actions sometimes undertaken to achieve monopoly status or the business practices once monopoly status is gained that generate the criticism. | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Tarquin Mills wrote: Quote:
BT. But then, the United States (and by extension, the rest of the world) wouldn't HAVE Windows. In its place would be something designed by the telephone company, say, UNIX. There was a time, not so very long ago, when, with every tolling of the hour by Big Ben, the British Ensign was being hoisted at dawn somewhere on the globe. Now, with every tick of the Atomic Clock at the National Bureau of Standards, somewhere on the earth Microsoft Windows displays its opening logo (often for the fifteenth time of the day). | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Norwich says NO to Windows?.. -- Mike Hall MS-MVP Windows Shell/User "Tarquin Mills" <person@use.net> wrote in message news:5875d53f4e.Usenet@localhost.local... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Product Key Activation Redundancy | Rawnchie14 | Windows Vista Administration | 5 | 07-18-2006 04:27 AM |
| Product Activation | Qihao Fu | Windows XP Basics | 5 | 11-11-2003 12:17 AM |
| product activation | mary jones | Windows XP Help & Support | 4 | 10-20-2003 09:14 PM |
| Product activation when you've lost your Product ID sticker | larry samuels MS-MVP \(XP Shell/User\) | Windows XP Basics | 2 | 07-05-2003 10:38 AM |
| Product activation key | Ernest K. Some | Windows XP Accessibility | 2 | 07-01-2003 10:26 PM |