Not to sound like Kevin but when will msdn get a new VISTA?

"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23ByndOacGHA.4932@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> BETA 2, sometime after WinHEC 2006.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "michael e dziatkowicz" <mnmma@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:at2dnQID65QEDsDZnZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..

>> I'm getting tired of waiting for a new vista already. Cumon Microsoft
>> throw us a bone already. It's already been 3 months since we've had a new
>> build and I don't even want to try 5308 because people tell me it will
>> basically destroy my computer. Give me a stable Vista build I can use.
>> Something worth the money we paid for MSDN.
>>

>

that's too long. We need something NOW not in June. I paid $740 for MSDN and
I expect a new build every month or so or at least as often as beta testers
get them.

My company paid over $7000 for my MSDN, and I still don't get newer builds
of Vista via MSDN. Beta builds are a bonus for MSDN subscribers, not a
right. If you want more frequent builds, you should have got yourself on the
tech beta, it wasn't hard to do (even I managed it ).

--
</Slugsie>
"michael e dziatkowicz" <mnmma@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:VJmdnR3NbIf3OMDZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..

> that's too long. We need something NOW not in June. I paid $740 for MSDN
> and I expect a new build every month or so or at least as often as beta
> testers get them.
>

I know it's a pain, but you get so much other stuff with MSDN as well - the
latest Windows Server System stuff, the latest technologies, it's not all
about Vista. Hey, with all the stuff you get such as WinFS (beta 1's already
out, you should have access to it), WinFX etc., you should be able to
develop applications for Vista *without* Vista!

But as Andre said, expect an MSDN build sometime towards or just after
WinHEC - this month )

--
Zack Whittaker
» ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
» MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
» Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
that up!

--: Original message follows :--
"Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:O8nU1GccGHA.724@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> My company paid over $7000 for my MSDN, and I still don't get newer builds
> of Vista via MSDN. Beta builds are a bonus for MSDN subscribers, not a
> right. If you want more frequent builds, you should have got yourself on
> the tech beta, it wasn't hard to do (even I managed it ).
>
> --
> </Slugsie>
> "michael e dziatkowicz" <mnmma@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:VJmdnR3NbIf3OMDZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..

>> that's too long. We need something NOW not in June. I paid $740 for MSDN
>> and I expect a new build every month or so or at least as often as beta
>> testers get them.
>>

>
>

On Sun, 07 May 2006 11:33:46 +0100, Slugsie <me@privacy.net> wrote:

> you should have got yourself on the tech beta, it wasn't hard to do
> (even I managed it ).
>

Would have to disagree with you there. It was very diffucult to get on
the tech beta. Having seen some of the wasters that did get on, it does
make you wonder about Microsoft's selection critera... I was on Srv2003
R2 beta, and submitted loads of bugs, but got missed for the Vista tech
beta :-( The last MSDN release 5308 is so poor, it's virtually unusable
(in particular x64 is worse than x86).

Would be nice if MSDN subscribers got a montly build,kinda best build last
month..

Mark;
"Would be nice if MSDN subscribers got a montly..."
So it seems you are asking for the same builds as the Tech Beta and probably
more if you get them monthly.
Contrary to some of the myths floating around, Windows Vista builds do not
come to the Tech Beta about weekly.

--
Jupiter Jones [MVP]
http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
http://www.dts-l.org


"Mark Gillespie" <mark.gillespie@gmail.com> wrote in message
newsp.s86k09x2j2q9yy@vista-laptop
Would have to disagree with you there. It was very diffucult to get on
the tech beta. Having seen some of the wasters that did get on, it does
make you wonder about Microsoft's selection critera... I was on Srv2003
R2 beta, and submitted loads of bugs, but got missed for the Vista tech
beta :-( The last MSDN release 5308 is so poor, it's virtually unusable
(in particular x64 is worse than x86).

Would be nice if MSDN subscribers got a montly build,kinda best build last
month..

Same here, my Company also paid for my subscription and I am greatful, with
the amount stuff you get in their, you should be greatful. I am not even
excited about the BETA software (well I am in the Tech Beta, so I am not
qualified to say anything But we need to stop taking MSDN as a midas
touch, meaning we should have access to every single piece of MS Software. I
don't get Server 2003 Datacenter in my subscription, and I'm not complainin'

--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Slugsie" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:O8nU1GccGHA.724@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> My company paid over $7000 for my MSDN, and I still don't get newer builds
> of Vista via MSDN. Beta builds are a bonus for MSDN subscribers, not a
> right. If you want more frequent builds, you should have got yourself on
> the tech beta, it wasn't hard to do (even I managed it ).
>
> --
> </Slugsie>
> "michael e dziatkowicz" <mnmma@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:VJmdnR3NbIf3OMDZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..

>> that's too long. We need something NOW not in June. I paid $740 for MSDN
>> and I expect a new build every month or so or at least as often as beta
>> testers get them.
>>

>
>

michael e dziatkowicz wrote:

> that's too long. We need something NOW not in June. I paid $740 for MSDN
> and I expect a new build every month or so or at least as often as beta
> testers get them.

WinHEC is in two weeks (http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/winhec/).

MSDN subscriber != private beta tester

--
Tom Porterfield

MSDN Subscribers are not private beta testers.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Tom Porterfield" <tpporter@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:uT$GbBrcGHA.2456@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> michael e dziatkowicz wrote:
>

>> that's too long. We need something NOW not in June. I paid $740 for MSDN
>> and I expect a new build every month or so or at least as often as beta
>> testers get them.

>
> WinHEC is in two weeks (http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/winhec/).
>
> MSDN subscriber != private beta tester
>
> --
> Tom Porterfield