Real Geek Forums  

Go Back   Real Geek Forums > Archives > Operating Systems > Windows Vista

Notices

Reply

NTFS or FAT?

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2006, 02:31 AM   #1 (permalink)
Default NTFS or FAT?

I'm installing Vista on a second partition on my HDisk using BootIt NG. For
installing multiple OSes, BING recommends using FAT or FAT32, but I want to
ask other Vista users. Is FAT/32 fine, or is NTFS better?
CaffieneAddict
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-03-2006, 02:32 AM   #2 (permalink)
Default NTFS or FAT?

I'm installing Vista on a second partition on my HDisk using BootIt NG. The
installation manual for BING recommends that I use FAT or FAT32 for multiple
OSes, but I wanted to check with other users. Should I use FAT or FAT32, or
is NTFS better?
CaffieneAddict
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-03-2006, 02:35 AM   #3 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?

I would highly recommend NTFS. Much more secure and with Vista, that is one
of the main advantages is the updated security it has to protect the OS.
Not sure how it would act on a FAT system.

"CaffieneAddict" <CaffieneAddict@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3EDD2B94-09FF-46CC-9BBE-9BF6DF8AB3FD@microsoft.com...
Quote:
> I'm installing Vista on a second partition on my HDisk using BootIt NG.
> For
> installing multiple OSes, BING recommends using FAT or FAT32, but I want
> to
> ask other Vista users. Is FAT/32 fine, or is NTFS better?
Jason
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-03-2006, 02:37 AM   #4 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?

Vista only installs to NTFS.

"CaffieneAddict" <CaffieneAddict@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:3EDD2B94-09FF-46CC-9BBE-9BF6DF8AB3FD@microsoft.com...
Quote:
> I'm installing Vista on a second partition on my HDisk using BootIt NG.
> For
> installing multiple OSes, BING recommends using FAT or FAT32, but I want
> to
> ask other Vista users. Is FAT/32 fine, or is NTFS better?
John
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-03-2006, 02:39 AM   #5 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?

You haven`t ANY choice in the matter. Vista will only install on an NTFS
file system. During the installation, it will automatically format your
drive for NTFS. ..... John.


"CaffieneAddict" <CaffieneAddict@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news318926F-2AA8-4839-915C-E59C2F8AE38F@microsoft.com...
Quote:
> I'm installing Vista on a second partition on my HDisk using BootIt NG.
The
Quote:
> installation manual for BING recommends that I use FAT or FAT32 for
multiple
Quote:
> OSes, but I wanted to check with other users. Should I use FAT or FAT32,
or
Quote:
> is NTFS better?

Administrator\\jhafele
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-03-2006, 04:27 AM   #6 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?

FAT is not an option.

"Jason" <Jay@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:83CA88DB-E3E7-4865-B173-BE95DACCCC84@microsoft.com...
Quote:
>I would highly recommend NTFS. Much more secure and with Vista, that is
>one of the main advantages is the updated security it has to protect the
>OS. Not sure how it would act on a FAT system.
>
> "CaffieneAddict" <CaffieneAddict@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
> message news:3EDD2B94-09FF-46CC-9BBE-9BF6DF8AB3FD@microsoft.com...
Quote:
>> I'm installing Vista on a second partition on my HDisk using BootIt NG.
>> For
>> installing multiple OSes, BING recommends using FAT or FAT32, but I want
>> to
>> ask other Vista users. Is FAT/32 fine, or is NTFS better?
>

Colin Barnhorst
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-05-2006, 01:54 PM   #7 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?

> Vista only installs to NTFS.

That's what I'm thinking. Besides, FAT is limited to 2GB (4 if formatted
through an NT-based OS, I believe), so FAT doesn't even support partitions
large enough to install Vista...I think that settles it. :-)

FAT32 though...I still wouldn't recommend it...there goes all your
filesystem-based permissions...not to mention that over the years I've lost
a lot more data because of a corrupted FAT32 partition than NTFS...


Homer J. Simpson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-05-2006, 07:44 PM   #8 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?


"Homer J. Simpson" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
news:Oha7GqDoGHA.4000@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Quote:
>> Vista only installs to NTFS.
>
> That's what I'm thinking. Besides, FAT is limited to 2GB (4 if formatted
> through an NT-based OS, I believe), so FAT doesn't even support partitions
> large enough to install Vista...I think that settles it. :-)
>
> FAT32 though...I still wouldn't recommend it...there goes all your
> filesystem-based permissions...not to mention that over the years I've
> lost a lot more data because of a corrupted FAT32 partition than NTFS...
>
Vista will not install on FAT32. It will run on FAT32 if you convert it
after the fact, but why?


Tom Scales
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-05-2006, 07:51 PM   #9 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?

Where did you find a utility to convert from
NTFS to FAT32?

The only way I have heard of for converting NTFS
to FAT32 was to use a Win98 or WinME boot disk,
delete the NTFS partition, recreate a partition,
and format to FAT32. In the process you would
lose the Vista installation!

Tom Scales wrote:
Quote:
> "Homer J. Simpson" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
> news:Oha7GqDoGHA.4000@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Quote:
>>> Vista only installs to NTFS.
>> That's what I'm thinking. Besides, FAT is limited to 2GB (4 if formatted
>> through an NT-based OS, I believe), so FAT doesn't even support partitions
>> large enough to install Vista...I think that settles it. :-)
>>
>> FAT32 though...I still wouldn't recommend it...there goes all your
>> filesystem-based permissions...not to mention that over the years I've
>> lost a lot more data because of a corrupted FAT32 partition than NTFS...
>>
>
> Vista will not install on FAT32. It will run on FAT32 if you convert it
> after the fact, but why?
>
>
Rick
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Old 07-05-2006, 08:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Default Re: NTFS or FAT?

Partitionmagic
"Rick" <Rick@Discussions.Microsoft.Com> wrote in message
news:u1XacxGoGHA.1656@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
Quote:
> Where did you find a utility to convert from NTFS to FAT32?
>
> The only way I have heard of for converting NTFS to FAT32 was to use a
> Win98 or WinME boot disk, delete the NTFS partition, recreate a partition,
> and format to FAT32. In the process you would lose the Vista
> installation!
>
> Tom Scales wrote:
Quote:
>> "Homer J. Simpson" <root@127.0.0.1> wrote in message
>> news:Oha7GqDoGHA.4000@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
Quote:
>>>> Vista only installs to NTFS.
>>> That's what I'm thinking. Besides, FAT is limited to 2GB (4 if
>>> formatted through an NT-based OS, I believe), so FAT doesn't even
>>> support partitions large enough to install Vista...I think that settles
>>> it. :-)
>>>
>>> FAT32 though...I still wouldn't recommend it...there goes all your
>>> filesystem-based permissions...not to mention that over the years I've
>>> lost a lot more data because of a corrupted FAT32 partition than NTFS...
>>>
>>
>> Vista will not install on FAT32. It will run on FAT32 if you convert it
>> after the fact, but why?

Tom Scales
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Reply With Quote  
Reply

Tags
None

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NTFS Joel Schoonbaert Customize Windows XP 10 04-17-2004 07:58 PM
ntfs win2000 to ntfs win nt dean Windows XP Basics 6 09-18-2003 02:52 AM
2 HDs with NTFS? Allan Windows XP Setup 0 07-26-2003 10:03 PM
Time limit for "convert c: /fs:ntfs" (convert FAT to NTFS)? John Windows XP 1 07-10-2003 04:22 PM
NTfS and 98 NobodyMan Windows XP Hardware 1 07-07-2003 04:41 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2005 - 2007 RealGeek.com. All rights reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48