Optimize to 400Mhz
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
| lojo |
> I have a 400Mhz mother board and my 1 gig upgrade of
> memory runs at 400Mhz. I am using windows XP Home Edition.
> My computer boots at 200Mhz. Is there a safe way to bring
> my computer up to 400Mhz. If possible please advise the
> steps necessary. Thank You
| Jerry |
>I have a 400Mhz mother board and my 1 gig upgrade of
> memory runs at 400Mhz. I am using windows XP Home Edition.
> My computer boots at 200Mhz. Is there a safe way to bring
> my computer up to 400Mhz. If possible please advise the
> steps necessary. Thank You
| NoNoBadDog! |
>-----Original Message-----Rate) memory. 200 x 2
>You have a motherboard that supports DDR (Double Data
>= 400. Your computer is already "optimized". Your FSBis set as it should
>be...200 MHz. Your memory modules can move data on therise and fall of
>each clock cycle for an *effective* speed of 400 MHz. Ofcourse, if you had
>bothered to read the manual, you would have known this.message
>
>Bobby
>
>"lojo" <[email protected]> wrote in
>news:3bc401c47288$45c51880$[email protected]..Edition.>>I have a 400Mhz mother board and my 1 gig upgrade of
>> memory runs at 400Mhz. I am using windows XP Home
bring>> My computer boots at 200Mhz. Is there a safe way to
>> my computer up to 400Mhz. If possible please advise the>
>> steps necessary. Thank You
>
>.
>
> Whoa! That's a bit harsh don't you think? Not everyone
> can be blessed with brilliance and completely understand
> what they are reading. Even you started out as a newguy.
>>>-----Original Message-----> Rate) memory. 200 x 2
>>You have a motherboard that supports DDR (Double Data>>= 400. Your computer is already "optimized". Your FSB> is set as it should>>be...200 MHz. Your memory modules can move data on the> rise and fall of>>each clock cycle for an *effective* speed of 400 MHz. Of> course, if you had>>bothered to read the manual, you would have known this.> message
>>
>>Bobby
>>
>>"lojo" <[email protected]> wrote in>>news:3bc401c47288$45c51880$[email protected]..> Edition.>>>I have a 400Mhz mother board and my 1 gig upgrade of
>>> memory runs at 400Mhz. I am using windows XP Home> bring>>> My computer boots at 200Mhz. Is there a safe way to>>> my computer up to 400Mhz. If possible please advise the>>
>>> steps necessary. Thank You
>>
>>.
>>
| NoNoBadDog! |
> Yes, I started out as a newguy. But I read manuals and educated myself.I
> find it ironic that there are people, like to OP, who can spout numbersand
> terminology and have absolutely no clue what they are talking about. Awrapped
> single paragraph in the manual that came with his motherboard would have
> answered his question. Laziness should not be rewarded with a gift
> answer. The logical thing to do if you suspect there is a discrepancywith
> settings on your motherboard, is to check the manual.
>
> Bobby
>
> <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:3bbc01c472b0$5c2ed480$[email protected]..> > Whoa! That's a bit harsh don't you think? Not everyone>
> > can be blessed with brilliance and completely understand
> > what they are reading. Even you started out as a newguy.
> >> >>-----Original Message-----> > Rate) memory. 200 x 2
> >>You have a motherboard that supports DDR (Double Data> >>= 400. Your computer is already "optimized". Your FSB> > is set as it should> >>be...200 MHz. Your memory modules can move data on the> > rise and fall of> >>each clock cycle for an *effective* speed of 400 MHz. Of> > course, if you had> >>bothered to read the manual, you would have known this.> > message
> >>
> >>Bobby
> >>
> >>"lojo" <[email protected]> wrote in> >>news:3bc401c47288$45c51880$[email protected]..> > Edition.
> >>>I have a 400Mhz mother board and my 1 gig upgrade of
> >>> memory runs at 400Mhz. I am using windows XP Home> >>> My computer boots at 200Mhz. Is there a safe way to> > bring> >>> my computer up to 400Mhz. If possible please advise the
> >>> steps necessary. Thank You
> >>
> >>
> >>.
> >>
>
| Ted Zieglar aka Rocky |
>-----Original Message-----educated myself. I
>Yes, I started out as a newguy. But I read manuals and
>find it ironic that there are people, like to OP, whocan spout numbers and
>terminology and have absolutely no clue what they aretalking about. A
>single paragraph in the manual that came with hismotherboard would have
>answered his question. Laziness should not be rewardedwith a gift wrapped
>answer. The logical thing to do if you suspect there isa discrepancy with
>settings on your motherboard, is to check the manual.understand
>
>Bobby
>
><[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:3bbc01c472b0$5c2ed480$[email protected]..>> Whoa! That's a bit harsh don't you think? Not everyone
>> can be blessed with brilliance and completely
newguy.>> what they are reading. Even you started out as a
Of>>>>>-----Original Message----->> Rate) memory. 200 x 2
>>>You have a motherboard that supports DDR (Double Data>>>= 400. Your computer is already "optimized". Your FSB>> is set as it should>>>be...200 MHz. Your memory modules can move data on the>> rise and fall of>>>each clock cycle for an *effective* speed of 400 MHz.
the>> course, if you had>>>bothered to read the manual, you would have known this.>> message
>>>
>>>Bobby
>>>
>>>"lojo" <[email protected]> wrote in>>>news:3bc401c47288$45c51880$[email protected]. .>> Edition.
>>>>I have a 400Mhz mother board and my 1 gig upgrade of
>>>> memory runs at 400Mhz. I am using windows XP Home>>>> My computer boots at 200Mhz. Is there a safe way to>> bring>>>> my computer up to 400Mhz. If possible please advise
>>>>> steps necessary. Thank You
>>>
>>>
>>>.
>>>
>
>.
>
> You obviously have a great opinion of yourself. I can
> see that in your speech. You also haven't read some of
> the crap they call "users manuals" coming out of china
> where they make the damn things. In barely
> comprehensible "english" they try to explain things that
> appear to be way over their heads, both as technicians
> and translators. I'm a fair hand within a computer and
> still I don't know all there is to know. I weep for you.
| Shenan Stanley |
> anonymous wrote:> > You obviously have a great opinion of yourself. I can>
> > see that in your speech. You also haven't read some of
> > the crap they call "users manuals" coming out of china
> > where they make the damn things. In barely
> > comprehensible "english" they try to explain things that
> > appear to be way over their heads, both as technicians
> > and translators. I'm a fair hand within a computer and
> > still I don't know all there is to know. I weep for you.
>
> You weep for them?
>
> I'll just leave it at that......
>
> --
> <- Shenan ->
> --
> The information is provided "as is", with no guarantees of
> completeness, accuracy or timeliness, and without warranties of any
> kind, express or implied. In other words, read up before you take any
> advice - you are the one ultimately responsible for your actions.
>
>
>
| Balsak |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What's the best OS for an old IMAC 400mhz 128mb ram and CD-rom | Guest | Apple Macintosh | 0 | 06-21-2008 01:41 PM |
| Is it better to have 1GB of RAM @ 266MHZ OR 512MB @ 400MHZ? | Guest | Windows NT/2000/XP | 0 | 06-06-2008 05:32 AM |
| Firewire 800MHz vs 400MHz? | Kenny | Windows XP Movie Maker | 3 | 10-11-2006 11:43 AM |
| iMac G3 400mHz question | Arthur Engh | Apple Macintosh | 1 | 02-13-2005 10:09 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |

Linear Mode


Posts: n/a