![]() |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Why do poeple have to mock something so badly when something new comes out? http://www.istartedsomething.com/200...ctx10-fabulous This website compared DX9 with DX10 (DX3D10), and I am so shocked that they went with the fat guy that is nooooooo way uses all the Shader Model 1.0 capabilities, let along SM3.0. This is more like DX8 graphics. That guy looks like Fat Bastard in Austin Powers tho. I remember when DX9 first came out 4 years ago ppl mocked DX8 for their "low precision", "coarse graphics", etc, but at least it was true. But now it's not so with DX10 v DX9. The improvements are no so noticeable this round. DX10 has got more under-the-hood improvements than "precision improvements" DX9 can render very closely to those in the DX10 version, if not exactly. If you put the GPU's performance bottleneck aside, DX9 (SM1.0 - SM3.0) is very capable of rendering virtually everything DX10 can dish out, but just less efficiently. The point is they just make it look like DX9 is so worthless when it's NOT. | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| This folder is shared with other people... solution | Jake | Windows Vista File Management | 0 | 02-22-2007 04:48 AM |