performance

i have the same problem on the winXP pro sp2 ...when i have install Kerio Personal firewall 4.1.x ... all the svchost.exe are very heavy load .. and system is not responding ... how i correct it?

Hubert
--------------------------
hubert@zilina.sk
http://hubert.qsh.sk




"Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message news:On$o4pgjGHA.1272@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Hi Hubert,
>
> Svchost.exe is a system process that loads many different system tasks.
> Process Explorer here should help you uncover which task is causing the
> heavy load: http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilitie...sexplorer.html, just
> make sure you get the right version for your system. I've tested both the 32
> and 64 bit versions for XP in Vista and they work fine.
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>
> "Hubert" <hubka@zilina.sk> wrote in message
> news:e4ehVJgjGHA.4716@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> hi,
>
> i install wista and i have problem with svchost.exe ... this services
> consume 64%-80% procesor resource
>
> rating of my pc is 1. (Intel P4 2,8GHz HT, 1GB ram duacl channel, 80GB HDD,
> GeForce4 mx 440 64MB)
> Hubert
> --------------------------
> hubert@zilina.sk
> http://hubert.qsh.sk
>
>

Seems like you should ask Kerio about making their product work with Windows.


"Hubert" wrote:

> i have the same problem on the winXP pro sp2 ...when i have install Kerio Personal firewall 4.1.x ... all the svchost.exe are very heavy load .. and system is not responding ... how i correct it?
>
> Hubert
> --------------------------
> hubert@zilina.sk
> http://hubert.qsh.sk
>
>
>
>
> "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message news:On$o4pgjGHA.1272@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>

> > Hi Hubert,
> >
> > Svchost.exe is a system process that loads many different system tasks.
> > Process Explorer here should help you uncover which task is causing the
> > heavy load: http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilitie...sexplorer.html, just
> > make sure you get the right version for your system. I've tested both the 32
> > and 64 bit versions for XP in Vista and they work fine.
> >
> > --
> > Best of Luck,
> >
> > Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> > Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
> >
> > "Hubert" <hubka@zilina.sk> wrote in message
> > news:e4ehVJgjGHA.4716@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> > hi,
> >
> > i install wista and i have problem with svchost.exe ... this services
> > consume 64%-80% procesor resource
> >
> > rating of my pc is 1. (Intel P4 2,8GHz HT, 1GB ram duacl channel, 80GB HDD,
> > GeForce4 mx 440 64MB)
> > Hubert
> > --------------------------
> > hubert@zilina.sk
> > http://hubert.qsh

my problem is in IPV6 ... i disablet it and performance is up 50% ...but no
100% ... svchost.exe still get 50% resources procesor ... help me anyone ...

"Mark D. VandenBerg" wrote:

> Seems like you should ask Kerio about making their product work with Windows.
>
>
> "Hubert" wrote:
>

> > i have the same problem on the winXP pro sp2 ...when i have install Kerio Personal firewall 4.1.x ... all the svchost.exe are very heavy load .. and system is not responding ... how i correct it?
> >
> > Hubert
> > --------------------------
> > hubert@zilina.sk
> > http://hubert.qsh.sk
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Rick Rogers" <rick@mvps.org> wrote in message news:On$o4pgjGHA.1272@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> >

> > > Hi Hubert,
> > >
> > > Svchost.exe is a system process that loads many different system tasks.
> > > Process Explorer here should help you uncover which task is causing the
> > > heavy load: http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilitie...sexplorer.html, just
> > > make sure you get the right version for your system. I've tested both the 32
> > > and 64 bit versions for XP in Vista and they work fine.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best of Luck,
> > >
> > > Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> > > http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> > > Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
> > >
> > > "Hubert" <hubka@zilina.sk> wrote in message
> > > news:e4ehVJgjGHA.4716@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> > > hi,
> > >
> > > i install wista and i have problem with svchost.exe ... this services
> > > consume 64%-80% procesor resource
> > >
> > > rating of my pc is 1. (Intel P4 2,8GHz HT, 1GB ram duacl channel, 80GB HDD,
> > > GeForce4 mx 440 64MB)
> > > Hubert
> > > --------------------------
> > > hubert@zilina.sk
> > > http://hubert.qsh

It may be just that Vista code is Beta and is not optimized to run
efficiently, which is done so that it is easier for programmers to go back
into the code and fix things.


"Hubert" wrote:

> my problem is in IPV6 ... i disablet it and performance is up 50% ...but no
> 100% ... svchost.exe still get 50% resources procesor ... help me anyone ...
>

With the approximate same software and same background programs running
(with the exceptions of the ones built into Vista) here's how a few of my
tests went with my stop-watch.

XP's start-up time (starting from the splash screen until the desktop is
fully loaded): 1 minute 5 seconds
Vista's start-up time (starting from the splash screen until the desktop is
fully loaded): 1 minute 41 seconds (if it weren't for the sidebar, it
probably could shave 10 to 15 seconds off of the time)

XP's opening a 3.9GB playlist to WMP10: 1.5 seconds
Vista's opening a 3.9GB playlist to WMP11 (same playlist on the same drive):
1.6 seconds

XP's shut-down time: 12 seconds
Vista's shut-down time: 28 seconds

Specs:
AMD Sempron 2800+ OC'd to 1.92GHz (Yes, I'm overclocking again)
1.5GB of RAM PC-3000 & PC-3200
XP's hard drive: WD 80GB 7200RPM 2MB cache IDE hard drive
Vista's hard drive: WD 120GB (60GB partition) 7200RPM 8MB cache IDE hard
drive
Ati Radeon X1600 PRO 256MB of GDDR2 RAM (AGP 8x)
etc.
etc.

Vista's 'size on disk' in the Windows folder: 7.22GB 36,917 files
XP's 'size on disk' in the Windows folder: 2.61GB 17,608 files

When I go into the performance rating tool in Vista, it tells me that my
audio drivers may be making my computer start slower, so I'll give Vista the
benefit of the doubt there. I'll also say that's it's only beta and still
has some debugging to be done, so we'll have to wait and see until at least
RC1 if not final to see what the results are then.

Forgive me if this has been addressed earlier, but I didn't spot it.

What's the top performance rating? I have a 3.7, which I'm told is OK, on a
Dell Dimension e510.

But what's the best?

"Bill Condie" <billcondie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:uDFO3lTzGHA.3568@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Forgive me if this has been addressed earlier, but I didn't spot it.
>
> What's the top performance rating? I have a 3.7, which I'm told is OK, on
> a Dell Dimension e510.
>
> But what's the best?

5 I think. That would be maximum 5 score for each component and and average
of those out of 5. Or something like that :-)

Thanks!

Anyone here got a 5?

Can you tell us your system?


"Beck" <beck@none> wrote in message
news:usu5YrTzGHA.996@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>
> "Bill Condie" <billcondie@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uDFO3lTzGHA.3568@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>> Forgive me if this has been addressed earlier, but I didn't spot it.
>>
>> What's the top performance rating? I have a 3.7, which I'm told is OK, on
>> a Dell Dimension e510.
>>
>> But what's the best?

>
> 5 I think. That would be maximum 5 score for each component and and
> average of those out of 5. Or something like that :-)
>