RAID

Posted: 07-03-2003, 08:14 PM
I have an asus a7v333 motherboard and it has onboard raid
from Promise technology it uses the fasttrack133
controller i have driver issues in windows Xp saying that
that driver isnt digitally signed and i would like to get
a driver that is. I have gone to asus but they dont have
and updated driver same with Promise technologies. I was
wondering if there maybe something i can do

Thanks for your time

Famine24
Reply With Quote

Responses to "RAID"

Pete Baker
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: RAID
Posted: 07-03-2003, 08:30 PM
Famine24

'Driver not digitally signed' just means that the hardware manufacturer has
not supplied the driver to Microsoft for testing. Generally there will be
no direct problems as a result of this - it simply means that the HW
manufacturers hasn't paid for the 'designed for XP' sticker. If you want a
digitally signed driver, and the hardware manufacturer does not supply one,
then you're out of luck.

hope that helps
Pete
-------------------

"Famine24" <famine24@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:03e401c34197$63655bc0$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> I have an asus a7v333 motherboard and it has onboard raid
> from Promise technology it uses the fasttrack133
> controller i have driver issues in windows Xp saying that
> that driver isnt digitally signed and i would like to get
> a driver that is. I have gone to asus but they dont have
> and updated driver same with Promise technologies. I was
> wondering if there maybe something i can do
>
> Thanks for your time
>
> Famine24

Reply With Quote
ian
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Raid
Posted: 09-26-2003, 01:01 PM
I have a motherboard with raid on it. I only have one hard
drive so can raid be used with one hard drive and further
more what is this raid meant to do.
Reply With Quote
Shane McCook
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Raid
Posted: 09-26-2003, 02:33 PM
You can set up your machine with 1 drive on the RAID
controller. The RAID controller will recognize the drive
and use it normally. I ran my machine like this for about
a year with no issues. It can be handy if you are
planning on using more than 4 IDE devices. It lets you
have your primary HDD on the RAID and then 4
optical/zip/HDD/etc drives on the IDE controller. I found
that the RAID boot time nearly doubled my system Boot
Time. I was running mine that way because of cabling
issues (HDD down low and optical up high is a full tower)

part II

RAID 101, the cliff notes version.
RAID stands for Redundant Array of Inexpensive Drives or
Redundant Array of Independent Drives.
RAID has 2 basic settings that do different things.
RAID-0, also called striping, sets up 2 or more HDD so
that the PC sees them as 1 big drive. The machine writes
data across all of the drives in stripes. This boosts
performance because you reduce seek times. Were in a
single drive the drive head has to sweep back and forth
across the platters getting data, the striped array lets
one send data while the next looks and then sends data.
This sends the data out in a more continuous stream. The
down side being that if you loose one drive in the array,
the whole array is lost.
RAID-1, also called mirroring, takes 2 drives and writes
the same data to both at the same time. This gives you
backs up incase of the physical failure of one drive. The
down side being that you get the same amount of storage
for twice the price.
The other way RAID can be set up is RAID-1+0 or RAID-0+1,
where you take 4 or more drives and set up a striped array
and them mirror it to another set of identical drives.

Power users usually set up a RAID-0 so that they can get a
few more points in benchmarks. If you have critical data,
RAID-1 gives you protection from a physical failure of a
drive (but it offers no extra protection from other forms
of data loss or corruption such as a virus or Windows
SNAFU)

Personally I would avoid using RAID except as a 5th IDE
plug. I am re-cabling my system to run my HDD off of the
main IDE and am disabling the RAID controller. The change
in boot time is phenomenal.


>-----Original Message-----
>I have a motherboard with raid on it. I only have one
hard
>drive so can raid be used with one hard drive and further
>more what is this raid meant to do.
>.
>
Reply With Quote
Mikey
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Raid
Posted: 09-26-2003, 03:22 PM
Hi,
RAID= Random ARRAY (ensemble=more than one) of Independant Disks.
The name describes the functions and demands.

Very down to earth description ( not the most accurate but an "intro").
Raid "couples" a minimum of 2 disks or pairs of disks in different
agencements to (your choice) either increase
a) speed or
b) reliability, security...
....depending on the type of setup ( basically 4 of them) you select.

2 disks:
======
1 and 2 for speed==> split the files and synch them, faster tha a normal
EIDE setup.

1 and 2 for "doubling" the files on each=security, just about the same
speedwise as a normal EIDE setup.

4 disks:
======
1 and 2 split for speed plus 3 and 4 (same) for screaming speed also
==Fastest but the least secure as no doubling anywhere of the infos.

1 and 2 split for speed while
3 and 4 get duplicate of the infos on 1 and 2=fast but not screaming fast,
more secure than just above. Info duplicated.

Finally:
1 and 2= doubling of 1/2 of the overall infos WHILE
3 and 4= get to double the other half.

Summary: The fastest array is the least secure: one of the disk goes
then....
The slowest, the most.


"ian" <Andrewfan121@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1252e01c38425$dedf0500$a601280a@phx.gbl...
> I have a motherboard with raid on it. I only have one hard
> drive so can raid be used with one hard drive and further
> more what is this raid meant to do.

Reply With Quote
G.M.
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: Raid
Posted: 09-27-2003, 04:54 PM
"Mikey" <savagem(PMS)@sympatico.ca.not> wrote in
news:2ZXcb.11653$yD1.1499944@news20.bellglobal.com :
> Hi,
> RAID= Random ARRAY (ensemble=more than one) of Independant Disks.
> The name describes the functions and demands.
Wrong. RAID = Redundant Array of Independant (used to be Inexpensive)
Disks.
>
> Very down to earth description ( not the most accurate but an
> "intro"). Raid "couples" a minimum of 2 disks or pairs of disks in
> different agencements to (your choice) either increase
> a) speed or
> b) reliability, security...
> ...depending on the type of setup ( basically 4 of them) you select.
>
> 2 disks:
> ======
> 1 and 2 for speed==> split the files and synch them, faster tha a
> normal EIDE setup.
>
> 1 and 2 for "doubling" the files on each=security, just about the same
> speedwise as a normal EIDE setup.
>
> 4 disks:
> ======
> 1 and 2 split for speed plus 3 and 4 (same) for screaming speed also
> ==Fastest but the least secure as no doubling anywhere of the infos.
>
> 1 and 2 split for speed while
> 3 and 4 get duplicate of the infos on 1 and 2=fast but not screaming
> fast, more secure than just above. Info duplicated.
>
> Finally:
> 1 and 2= doubling of 1/2 of the overall infos WHILE
> 3 and 4= get to double the other half.
>
> Summary: The fastest array is the least secure: one of the disk goes
> then....
> The slowest, the most.
>
Not even close. Try www.sohoconsult.ch/raid/raid.html for a far more
accurate description.
>
> "ian" <Andrewfan121@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1252e01c38425$dedf0500$a601280a@phx.gbl...
>> I have a motherboard with raid on it. I only have one hard
>> drive so can raid be used with one hard drive and further more what
>> is this raid meant to do.
>
>
>


--
C:\DOS
C:\DOS\RUN
...\RUN\DOS\RUN
Reply With Quote
dj
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
raid
Posted: 11-28-2003, 03:52 PM
I am wondering if I new to start with claen hd's to
switch to raid or can i just install the drivers and plug
my existing formated drives into the controller
dragon kt400 ultra
windows xp

Reply With Quote
Yves Leclerc
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: raid
Posted: 11-28-2003, 04:28 PM
RAID setup need to re-format the drives so that the "virtual" drive is
correctly set up.

A RAID virtual drive is a definition on how to access the hard drives.
RAID 0 virtual drive setting: 2, or more, drives grouped
together to use all the storage capacity of all the
drives.
RAID 1 virtual drive setting: 2 drives (exactly to same size
each) are grouped together. Whenever the files are
written to the
first drive, an exact copy of the file is automatically done on the
second drive.
The drive capcite is the exact capacite of one drive (1/2 of the
total 2
drives). Known in the computer world as Disk Mirroring.

Y.


"dj" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:0a5401c3b5c7$94c16ed0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> I am wondering if I new to start with claen hd's to
> switch to raid or can i just install the drivers and plug
> my existing formated drives into the controller
> dragon kt400 ultra
> windows xp
>

Reply With Quote
Frank
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Re: raid
Posted: 11-29-2003, 07:48 PM

"dj" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:0a5401c3b5c7$94c16ed0$a301280a@phx.gbl...
> I am wondering if I new to start with claen hd's to
> switch to raid or can i just install the drivers and plug
> my existing formated drives into the controller
> dragon kt400 ultra
> windows xp
You don't specify which raid chip you are using. With the
Promise RAID controllers one can just install the drivers
to the original disk. Then attach the drives and build the
array.
Reply With Quote
Gwr
Guest
Posts: n/a
 
Raid
Posted: 01-04-2004, 05:15 PM
have tried countless times to install XP with the SP1a on
the disk. I have 2 120 gig serial ata drives and have a
asus a7n8x deluxe mobo. it has an nvidia 2 chipset. My
question is why after formatting the drive and installing
xp does it not boot? It comes up with an error message
saying could not find the op. system. THanks Gary
Reply With Quote
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Tony Thijs Windows Vista Printers & Scanners 1 08-08-2006 09:28 AM
Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Tony Thijs Windows Vista Performance & Maintenance 1 08-08-2006 09:28 AM
Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Tony Thijs Windows Vista Networking & Sharing 2 08-08-2006 09:27 AM
Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Tony Thijs Windows Vista Games 1 08-08-2006 09:23 AM
Work around Sil 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets and Vista; Gigabyte to take the lead in supporting legacy Silicon Image 3x12 SATA RAID chipsets after friendly wake up call's Tony Thijs Windows Vista Mail 3 08-05-2006 10:38 PM