RC2 - RTM
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
|
|
Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
Re: RC2 - RTM
"RandyH" <RHollaw@HOTmail.com> wrote in messagenews:325E0AAE-115A-47B3-BEC5-4C5D1F00B222@microsoft.com...
> Help about shows:AFAIK 57xx build numbers are RTM build pool so it probably just confirms
>
> Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
>
> Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
that RC2 was not planned to be released but they have changed their mind
later for some reason. I can only guess that it was due to too much bugs yet
to be fixed. Did you see recent thread about RC2 EULA still referring to
RC1? Same thing here...
--
Alexander Suhovey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
Interesting."Alexander Suhovey" <asuhovey@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8BE9D203-66FB-454B-AC1E-344D48A2EEFC@microsoft.com...
> "RandyH" <RHollaw@HOTmail.com> wrote in message
> news:325E0AAE-115A-47B3-BEC5-4C5D1F00B222@microsoft.com...>> Help about shows:>
>>
>> Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
>>
>> Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
> AFAIK 57xx build numbers are RTM build pool so it probably just confirms
> that RC2 was not planned to be released but they have changed their mind
> later for some reason. I can only guess that it was due to too much bugs
> yet to be fixed. Did you see recent thread about RC2 EULA still referring
> to RC1? Same thing here...
>
> --
> Alexander Suhovey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
RTM refers to the branch from which the build is made. It is not referringto any past intention to make this build Vista Gold. It means that 5744 is
in the branch that will eventually result in Vista Gold. Think of it as a
family name.
"RandyH" <RHollaw@HOTmail.com> wrote in message
news:325E0AAE-115A-47B3-BEC5-4C5D1F00B222@microsoft.com...
> Help about shows:
>
> Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
>
> Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
"Colin Barnhorst" <colinbarharst(remove)@msn.com> wrote in message
news:u2G89AK7GHA.4348@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> RTM refers to the branch from which the build is made. It is not
> referring to any past intention to make this build Vista Gold. It means
> that 5744 is in the branch that will eventually result in Vista Gold.
> Think of it as a family name.
>
> "RandyH" <RHollaw@HOTmail.com> wrote in message
> news:325E0AAE-115A-47B3-BEC5-4C5D1F00B222@microsoft.com...>> Help about shows:
>>
>> Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
>>
>> Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
However, it is certainly possible for a particular build to be
re-released/repacked as RTM. Example: Windows 95's RTM was identical to RC6
(a straight repack was done).
Christopher L. Estep
Windows XP Pro/Windows Vista RC2 Sible War
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
There will be at least some changes. If nothing else, keep in mind thatALL of the beta and "RC" versions of Vista are time-bombed and expire
next June, so the time-bomb will be removed. Also, we are not seeing
all of the "versions" (home basic, home premium, business, ultimate,
etc.) of Vista in the RCs.
CHristopher L. Estep wrote:
>>>>> Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
>
>
> However, it is certainly possible for a particular build to be
> re-released/repacked as RTM. Example: Windows 95's RTM was identical to
> RC6 (a straight repack was done).
>
> Christopher L. Estep
> Windows XP Pro/Windows Vista RC2 Sible War
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
What give you that idea?"RandyH" <RHollaw@HOTmail.com> wrote in message news:325E0AAE-115A-47B3-BEC5-4C5D1F00B222@microsoft.com...
Help about shows:
Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
Could RC2 be RTM is sheeps clothing?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
>From: William [mailto:woogles@charter.net]>Posted At: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:14 AM"_rtm_" part in build name:
>Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>Conversation: RC2 - RTM
>Subject: Re: RC2 - RTM
>š
>What give you that idea?
>Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)--
Alexander Suhovey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
All it means is that is is in the family tree that will be RTM."Alexander Suhovey" <asuhovey@gmail.com> wrote in message news:007401c6ed0a$71707890$8d01a8c0@a4vision.org.. .
>From: William [mailto:woogles@charter.net]"_rtm_" part in build name:
>Posted At: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:14 AM
>Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>Conversation: RC2 - RTM
>Subject: Re: RC2 - RTM
>
>What give you that idea?
>Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)--
Alexander Suhovey
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
Re: RC2 - RTM
>"William" <woogles@charter.net> wrote in message>news:C7C1A012-081D-48FA-80AC->4BEED585694B@microsoft.com...Sure. That's what OP was asking to clarify.
>All it means is that is is in the family tree that will be RTM.
>
>"Alexander Suhovey" <asuhovey@gmail.com> wrote in message> >news:007401c6ed0a$71707890>$8d01a8c0@a4vision.org ...>
>>From: William [mailto:woogles@charter.net]
>>Posted At: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 9:14 AM
>>Posted To: microsoft.public.windows.vista.general
>>Conversation: RC2 - RTM
>>Subject: Re: RC2 - RTM
>>
>>What give you that idea?
>>
>>"_rtm_" part in build name:
>>Version 6.0 (Build 5744.16384.x86fre.vista_rtm_erw.061003-1945)
>
--
Alexander Suhovey
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
 |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posts: n/a