Security warning
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
| crus |
> I've got a new SP2 image, everything is working but during start-up appear some
> -Security Warning Dialog boxes - saying that:
> "The publisher could not be verified. ......"
> Then I press the run button for all messages and than I have the full system OK.
> This should means that files are not digitally signed.
> After that I can install applications, even old ones, but this warning doesn't appears any more, until next startup.
> Files that are indicated as digitally unsigned get executed at start up and are listed in the registry key
> HKLM\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
> they are tray applications loaded by driver components as
> hwincal.exe, (touch) igfxtray.exe,( intel video driver) hkcmd.exe, igfxpers.exe
>
> To check this behavior I started the GroupPolicy Editor ( gpedit.msc) where I find everything undefined, and set the Attachment
> Manager "inclusion list for low files types" to disable warning for ALL .exe files. With this setting the warning box is not
> shown, but this is not the way to understand what is wrong.
>
> I looked in FBA log and found RegSetKeySecurity Failed Error: 0x6
> that seems someway related.
> I hope that someone can give help to understand what's happening.
> Raffaele
>
>
| KM |
> Raffaele,
>
> I'd say that you fixed that the right way on an embedded system where you
> control what Exe's are to be launched.
> You could also fix it by modifying the following reg.entries directly:
> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
> Explorer\Download],"RunInvalidSignatures"
> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
> Explorer\Download],"CheckExeSignatures"
>
> If you want to know why you're seeing the warning you probably want first
> to debug what file [exe] is the "wrong" one. (just remove all the agent
> apps from the Run key and launch them at run time manually to see which
> one shows the warning)
>
>
> --
> =========
> Regards,
> KM
>
>
> "crus" <crus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:e5mr4QJDHHA.3660@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...>> I've got a new SP2 image, everything is working but during start-up>
>> appear some
>> -Security Warning Dialog boxes - saying that:
>> "The publisher could not be verified. ......"
>> Then I press the run button for all messages and than I have the full
>> system OK.
>> This should means that files are not digitally signed.
>> After that I can install applications, even old ones, but this warning
>> doesn't appears any more, until next startup.
>> Files that are indicated as digitally unsigned get executed at start up
>> and are listed in the registry key
>> HKLM\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
>> they are tray applications loaded by driver components as
>> hwincal.exe, (touch) igfxtray.exe,( intel video driver) hkcmd.exe,
>> igfxpers.exe
>>
>> To check this behavior I started the GroupPolicy Editor ( gpedit.msc)
>> where I find everything undefined, and set the Attachment Manager
>> "inclusion list for low files types" to disable warning for ALL .exe
>> files. With this setting the warning box is not shown, but this is not
>> the way to understand what is wrong.
>>
>> I looked in FBA log and found RegSetKeySecurity Failed Error: 0x6
>> that seems someway related.
>> I hope that someone can give help to understand what's happening.
>> Raffaele
>>
>>
>
| crus |
> Raffaele,
>
> I'd say that you fixed that the right way on an embedded system where you
> control what Exe's are to be launched.
> You could also fix it by modifying the following reg.entries directly:
> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
> Explorer\Download],"RunInvalidSignatures"
> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
> Explorer\Download],"CheckExeSignatures"
>
> If you want to know why you're seeing the warning you probably want first
> to debug what file [exe] is the "wrong" one. (just remove all the agent
> apps from the Run key and launch them at run time manually to see which
> one shows the warning)
>
>
> --
> =========
> Regards,
> KM
>
>
> "crus" <crus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:e5mr4QJDHHA.3660@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...>> I've got a new SP2 image, everything is working but during start-up>
>> appear some
>> -Security Warning Dialog boxes - saying that:
>> "The publisher could not be verified. ......"
>> Then I press the run button for all messages and than I have the full
>> system OK.
>> This should means that files are not digitally signed.
>> After that I can install applications, even old ones, but this warning
>> doesn't appears any more, until next startup.
>> Files that are indicated as digitally unsigned get executed at start up
>> and are listed in the registry key
>> HKLM\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
>> they are tray applications loaded by driver components as
>> hwincal.exe, (touch) igfxtray.exe,( intel video driver) hkcmd.exe,
>> igfxpers.exe
>>
>> To check this behavior I started the GroupPolicy Editor ( gpedit.msc)
>> where I find everything undefined, and set the Attachment Manager
>> "inclusion list for low files types" to disable warning for ALL .exe
>> files. With this setting the warning box is not shown, but this is not
>> the way to understand what is wrong.
>>
>> I looked in FBA log and found RegSetKeySecurity Failed Error: 0x6
>> that seems someway related.
>> I hope that someone can give help to understand what's happening.
>> Raffaele
>>
>>
>
| crus |
>I find also that all .EXE that gives security warning when run show a
> security message in their Property :
> "this file comes from an other computer and might be blocket to protect this
> computer"
> a button "unblock" is on side to make disappear this message and to allows
> free use of the file.
> As I said in my first message all files that behaves this way are installed
> by components some already available and some ( as igfxcfg.exe ) that I made from Intel device drivers with CD.
>
>
> "KM" <konstmor@nospam_yahoo.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
> news:%23YNWRZaDHHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...>> Raffaele,>
>>
>> I'd say that you fixed that the right way on an embedded system where you
>> control what Exe's are to be launched.
>> You could also fix it by modifying the following reg.entries directly:
>> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
>> Explorer\Download],"RunInvalidSignatures"
>> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
>> Explorer\Download],"CheckExeSignatures"
>>
>> If you want to know why you're seeing the warning you probably want first
>> to debug what file [exe] is the "wrong" one. (just remove all the agent
>> apps from the Run key and launch them at run time manually to see which
>> one shows the warning)
>>
>>
>> --
>> =========
>> Regards,
>> KM
>>
>>
>> "crus" <crus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:e5mr4QJDHHA.3660@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...>>> I've got a new SP2 image, everything is working but during start-up>>
>>> appear some
>>> -Security Warning Dialog boxes - saying that:
>>> "The publisher could not be verified. ......"
>>> Then I press the run button for all messages and than I have the full
>>> system OK.
>>> This should means that files are not digitally signed.
>>> After that I can install applications, even old ones, but this warning
>>> doesn't appears any more, until next startup.
>>> Files that are indicated as digitally unsigned get executed at start up
>>> and are listed in the registry key
>>> HKLM\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
>>> they are tray applications loaded by driver components as
>>> hwincal.exe, (touch) igfxtray.exe,( intel video driver) hkcmd.exe,
>>> igfxpers.exe
>>>
>>> To check this behavior I started the GroupPolicy Editor ( gpedit.msc)
>>> where I find everything undefined, and set the Attachment Manager
>>> "inclusion list for low files types" to disable warning for ALL .exe
>>> files. With this setting the warning box is not shown, but this is not
>>> the way to understand what is wrong.
>>>
>>> I looked in FBA log and found RegSetKeySecurity Failed Error: 0x6
>>> that seems someway related.
>>> I hope that someone can give help to understand what's happening.
>>> Raffaele
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
| KM |
> Raffaele,
>
> Well, that depends on how and from where you downloaded those files.
> When you downloaded a file from the Web on SP2 machine, Windows
> automatically marks the file attachment with its zone information (such as
> Restricted, local, internet..). Based on file's zone information Windows
> assigns a proper risk level (High, Moderate, or Low).
>
> To prevent Windows from checking Zone Information in files when user tries
> to open them in Windows Explorer you can set up the following key:
> [HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Pol icies\Associations]
>
> "LowRiskFileTypes"=".exe;.bat;.com;.cmd;.reg;.msi; .htm;.html;.gif;.bmp;.jpg;.avi;.mpg;.mpeg;.mov;.mp 3;.m3u;.wav;"
> (or whatever types you want to see here)
>
> On the machine where you are trying to download the files to prevent
> Windows from preserving Zone Information in file attachments you may want
> to set the following key:
> [HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Pol icies\Attachments]
> "SaveZoneInformation"=dword:1
>
> But I'd go and try the first key on your XPe image to not even worry about
> the file signatures for the defined types.
>
> --
> =========
> Regards,
> KM
>
>
> "crus" <crus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:O6d8WzkDHHA.952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...>>I find also that all .EXE that gives security warning when run show a>
>> security message in their Property :
>> "this file comes from an other computer and might be blocket to protect
>> this
>> computer"
>> a button "unblock" is on side to make disappear this message and to
>> allows
>> free use of the file.
>> As I said in my first message all files that behaves this way are
>> installed
>> by components some already available and some ( as igfxcfg.exe ) that I
>> made from Intel device drivers with CD.
>>
>>
>> "KM" <konstmor@nospam_yahoo.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
>> news:%23YNWRZaDHHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...>>> Raffaele,>>
>>>
>>> I'd say that you fixed that the right way on an embedded system where
>>> you
>>> control what Exe's are to be launched.
>>> You could also fix it by modifying the following reg.entries directly:
>>> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
>>> Explorer\Download],"RunInvalidSignatures"
>>> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
>>> Explorer\Download],"CheckExeSignatures"
>>>
>>> If you want to know why you're seeing the warning you probably want
>>> first
>>> to debug what file [exe] is the "wrong" one. (just remove all the agent
>>> apps from the Run key and launch them at run time manually to see which
>>> one shows the warning)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> =========
>>> Regards,
>>> KM
>>>
>>>
>>> "crus" <crus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>> news:e5mr4QJDHHA.3660@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> I've got a new SP2 image, everything is working but during start-up
>>>> appear some
>>>> -Security Warning Dialog boxes - saying that:
>>>> "The publisher could not be verified. ......"
>>>> Then I press the run button for all messages and than I have the full
>>>> system OK.
>>>> This should means that files are not digitally signed.
>>>> After that I can install applications, even old ones, but this warning
>>>> doesn't appears any more, until next startup.
>>>> Files that are indicated as digitally unsigned get executed at start up
>>>> and are listed in the registry key
>>>> HKLM\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
>>>> they are tray applications loaded by driver components as
>>>> hwincal.exe, (touch) igfxtray.exe,( intel video driver) hkcmd.exe,
>>>> igfxpers.exe
>>>>
>>>> To check this behavior I started the GroupPolicy Editor ( gpedit.msc)
>>>> where I find everything undefined, and set the Attachment Manager
>>>> "inclusion list for low files types" to disable warning for ALL .exe
>>>> files. With this setting the warning box is not shown, but this is not
>>>> the way to understand what is wrong.
>>>>
>>>> I looked in FBA log and found RegSetKeySecurity Failed Error: 0x6
>>>> that seems someway related.
>>>> I hope that someone can give help to understand what's happening.
>>>> Raffaele
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
| crus |
> not a new release!Well, quite frankly I did run into this issue before but since I always turned off all the XP security shields on my XPe images it
> Yes Konstantin,
> you are right it depends from the file download!
> The solution I found is, according your suggest, to add the key Attachment and a value to the DEVELOPMENT ( XP Pro SP2) registry:
>
> [HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Pol icies\Attachments]
> "SaveZoneInformation"=dword:1
>
> The Attachments key wasn't defined .
>
> If you have SP2 without this keys all downloaded files have a security
> info that the file is from unreliable source, just look at files's Properties of downloaded files to check.
> But I had components made with files downloaded before fix!
>
> This is my full story:
> BEFORE
> I downloaded some ZIP files for Intel video drivers and a ZIP file for
> touch screen, with ready XPE component,
> I expanded them, ( by compressed folders) made components from INF files, imported components into
> the database and respective repositories, made the XPE image and put it on
> the target hardware.
> During development I had no warning at all that downloaded ZIP files were marked unsecure,
> and also that ALL the expanded files were marked unsecure too!
> So I filled my repositories this way with .INF .EXE .SYS ... all marked
> unsecure and my images were maked too.
> The first run of XPE showed the warning message.
> NOW
> I have washed my component's repository to have them warning free and made the
> XPE image again, no more warning messages!
> The Reg fix for IE guarantees me only for future downloads, files that are on dev. machine need cleaning.
> It's strange that nobody found this before, since it depends from XPPro XP2,
> not a new release!
> Anyway thanks for the help to explore the problem, I hope that helps someone to save the time I lost on it.
> I plan to publish my video components in xpefiles, one reason more to be sure of its quality.
> regards
> Raffaele
>
> "KM" <konstmor@nospam_yahoo.com> ha scritto nel messaggio news:ul2hLvmDHHA.1748@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...>> Raffaele,>
>>
>> Well, that depends on how and from where you downloaded those files.
>> When you downloaded a file from the Web on SP2 machine, Windows automatically marks the file attachment with its zone information
>> (such as Restricted, local, internet..). Based on file's zone information Windows assigns a proper risk level (High, Moderate, or
>> Low).
>>
>> To prevent Windows from checking Zone Information in files when user tries to open them in Windows Explorer you can set up the
>> following key:
>> [HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Pol icies\Associations]
>>
>> "LowRiskFileTypes"=".exe;.bat;.com;.cmd;.reg;.msi; .htm;.html;.gif;.bmp;.jpg;.avi;.mpg;.mpeg;.mov;.mp 3;.m3u;.wav;" (or whatever
>> types you want to see here)
>>
>> On the machine where you are trying to download the files to prevent Windows from preserving Zone Information in file attachments
>> you may want to set the following key:
>> [HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Pol icies\Attachments]
>> "SaveZoneInformation"=dword:1
>>
>> But I'd go and try the first key on your XPe image to not even worry about the file signatures for the defined types.
>>
>> --
>> =========
>> Regards,
>> KM
>>
>>
>> "crus" <crus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:O6d8WzkDHHA.952@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...>>>I find also that all .EXE that gives security warning when run show a>>
>>> security message in their Property :
>>> "this file comes from an other computer and might be blocket to protect this
>>> computer"
>>> a button "unblock" is on side to make disappear this message and to allows
>>> free use of the file.
>>> As I said in my first message all files that behaves this way are installed
>>> by components some already available and some ( as igfxcfg.exe ) that I made from Intel device drivers with CD.
>>>
>>>
>>> "KM" <konstmor@nospam_yahoo.com> ha scritto nel messaggio
>>> news:%23YNWRZaDHHA.4928@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>> Raffaele,
>>>>
>>>> I'd say that you fixed that the right way on an embedded system where you
>>>> control what Exe's are to be launched.
>>>> You could also fix it by modifying the following reg.entries directly:
>>>> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
>>>> Explorer\Download],"RunInvalidSignatures"
>>>> [HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet
>>>> Explorer\Download],"CheckExeSignatures"
>>>>
>>>> If you want to know why you're seeing the warning you probably want first
>>>> to debug what file [exe] is the "wrong" one. (just remove all the agent
>>>> apps from the Run key and launch them at run time manually to see which
>>>> one shows the warning)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> =========
>>>> Regards,
>>>> KM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> "crus" <crus@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:e5mr4QJDHHA.3660@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...
>>>>> I've got a new SP2 image, everything is working but during start-up
>>>>> appear some
>>>>> -Security Warning Dialog boxes - saying that:
>>>>> "The publisher could not be verified. ......"
>>>>> Then I press the run button for all messages and than I have the full
>>>>> system OK.
>>>>> This should means that files are not digitally signed.
>>>>> After that I can install applications, even old ones, but this warning
>>>>> doesn't appears any more, until next startup.
>>>>> Files that are indicated as digitally unsigned get executed at start up
>>>>> and are listed in the registry key
>>>>> HKLM\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
>>>>> they are tray applications loaded by driver components as
>>>>> hwincal.exe, (touch) igfxtray.exe,( intel video driver) hkcmd.exe,
>>>>> igfxpers.exe
>>>>>
>>>>> To check this behavior I started the GroupPolicy Editor ( gpedit.msc)
>>>>> where I find everything undefined, and set the Attachment Manager
>>>>> "inclusion list for low files types" to disable warning for ALL .exe
>>>>> files. With this setting the warning box is not shown, but this is not
>>>>> the way to understand what is wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>> I looked in FBA log and found RegSetKeySecurity Failed Error: 0x6
>>>>> that seems someway related.
>>>>> I hope that someone can give help to understand what's happening.
>>>>> Raffaele
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
| KM |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| add-on installer--security warning | PA Bear | Windows Vista Security | 0 | 11-04-2007 08:54 PM |
| RDC Security Warning | Mike | Windows XP Work Remotely | 1 | 01-15-2004 11:30 PM |
| Security Warning & Virus | fungko | Windows XP Security & Administration | 0 | 08-29-2003 12:31 PM |
| Security warning and Update | sid | Windows XP Embedded | 1 | 08-06-2003 08:46 PM |
| Today's warning from Dept. of Homeland Security re security flaw | Dot | Windows XP Security & Administration | 3 | 08-02-2003 08:23 AM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |


Linear Mode


Posts: n/a