Setup fails on atapi.sys in-use thanks to Daemon tools
Guest
Posts: n/a
Posts: n/a
> I know this has been an issue with Service Packs on NT back to thebeginning
> of time, but due to the popularity of this software and the importance ofrestart. -
> XP-Sp2, I'd be inclined to think this is going to creep up more and more.
>
> Daemon Tools for mounting ISO's creates a device with a startup mode of
> [Boot] which cannot be stopped via device manager orWMI without a
> I'm surprised that normal in-use file methods(PendingFileRenameOperations)
> don't allow this filed to be updated with XP-SP2.
>
> Instead, the SP2 install fails on this file with no indication of how the
> user can identify why the file is in use or how to fix it.
>
> Respectfully submitted - not as a bug, but rather a 3rd party
> incompatibility/setup/user-experience concern.
>
> Dave Stafford
> d\a\v\e\@/s/t/a/f/f/o/r/d/./n/e/t
>
>
>I know this has been an issue with Service Packs on NT back to theThe third party vendor should fix there application so it behave normally or
>beginning
> of time, but due to the popularity of this software and the importance of
> XP-Sp2, I'd be inclined to think this is going to creep up more and more.
>
> Daemon Tools for mounting ISO's creates a device with a startup mode of
> [Boot] which cannot be stopped via device manager orWMI without a
> restart. -
> I'm surprised that normal in-use file methods
> (PendingFileRenameOperations)
> don't allow this filed to be updated with XP-SP2.
>
> Instead, the SP2 install fails on this file with no indication of how the
> user can identify why the file is in use or how to fix it.
>
> Respectfully submitted - not as a bug, but rather a 3rd party
> incompatibility/setup/user-experience concern.
>
> Dave Stafford
>I know this has been an issue with Service Packs on NT back to the
>beginning
> of time, but due to the popularity of this software and the importance of
> XP-Sp2, I'd be inclined to think this is going to creep up more and more.
>
> Daemon Tools for mounting ISO's creates a device with a startup mode of
> [Boot] which cannot be stopped via device manager orWMI without a
> restart. -
> I'm surprised that normal in-use file methods
> (PendingFileRenameOperations)
> don't allow this filed to be updated with XP-SP2.
>
> Instead, the SP2 install fails on this file with no indication of how the
> user can identify why the file is in use or how to fix it.
>
> Respectfully submitted - not as a bug, but rather a 3rd party
> incompatibility/setup/user-experience concern.
>
> Dave Stafford
> d\a\v\e\@/s/t/a/f/f/o/r/d/./n/e/t
>
>
> can at least be stopped etc, in the same way that the Nero tool that doesI would be happy to uninstall the application, but......
> exactly the same thing does.
> Maybe you should consider changing applications
>
> Regards,
> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]
The original poster has a known application that is not what you would>> The third party vendor should fix there application so it behave normally>
>> or
>> can at least be stopped etc, in the same way that the Nero tool that does
>> exactly the same thing does.
>> Maybe you should consider changing applications
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]
> I would be happy to uninstall the application, but......
> the real problem is, I don't know what application is causing the
> problem. It seems the only solution is to disable that unknown program
> from running.
>
> I've tried running service pack 1 from safe mode and atapi.sys is
> still open!
> Do you get it? How many times do we have to tell you this?
>
> Is Microsoft so helpless that they can't install ANY of the bug fixes
> when atapi.sys is open? How pathetic!
>
> Maybe Microsoft can take responsibility for the useless solutions they
> provide to their customers. I'm not holding my breath. I've seen full
> well, over the past decade, that Microsoft cares very much about
> destroying their competition, but otherwise, they don't give a damn
> about quality.
>
> Mike Brannigan's flippant response is a perfect example. As though
> it's not Microsoft's fault that they can't patch your system because
> some rogue program has a file open. It should be very simple for the
> Service Pack program to kill the process that has the file open. But
> it's easier to put the burden on the hapless customer who isn't given
> a clue as to what remedial measures he can take. So, Mike Brannigan,
> take your stupid answers, and your lack of concern for your customers,
> and shove it!
> I've tried running service pack 1 from safe mode and atapi.sys isAs regards your specific problem. You also obviously have an application
> still open!
> Do you get it? How many times do we have to tell you this?
>
> Maybe Microsoft can take responsibility for the useless solutions theyWhich "useless solution" ? since this is obviously a third party
> provide to their customers. I'm not holding my breath. I've seen full
> well, over the past decade, that Microsoft cares very much about
> destroying their competition, but otherwise, they don't give a damn
> about quality.
> Mike Brannigan's flippant response is a perfect example. As thoughYou simple cannot just "kill a process" in an ad hoc manner just because to
> it's not Microsoft's fault that they can't patch your system because
> some rogue program has a file open. It should be very simple for the
> Service Pack program to kill the process that has the file open. But
> it's easier to put the burden on the hapless customer who isn't given
> a clue as to what remedial measures he can take. So, Mike Brannigan,
> take your stupid answers, and your lack of concern for your customers,
> and shove it!
>> The third party vendor should fix there application so it behave normally>
>> or
>> can at least be stopped etc, in the same way that the Nero tool that does
>> exactly the same thing does.
>> Maybe you should consider changing applications
>>
>> Regards,
>> Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]
> I would be happy to uninstall the application, but......
> the real problem is, I don't know what application is causing the
> problem. It seems the only solution is to disable that unknown program
> from running.
>
> I've tried running service pack 1 from safe mode and atapi.sys is
> still open!
> Do you get it? How many times do we have to tell you this?
>
> Is Microsoft so helpless that they can't install ANY of the bug fixes
> when atapi.sys is open? How pathetic!
>
> Maybe Microsoft can take responsibility for the useless solutions they
> provide to their customers. I'm not holding my breath. I've seen full
> well, over the past decade, that Microsoft cares very much about
> destroying their competition, but otherwise, they don't give a damn
> about quality.
>
> Mike Brannigan's flippant response is a perfect example. As though
> it's not Microsoft's fault that they can't patch your system because
> some rogue program has a file open. It should be very simple for the
> Service Pack program to kill the process that has the file open. But
> it's easier to put the burden on the hapless customer who isn't given
> a clue as to what remedial measures he can take. So, Mike Brannigan,
> take your stupid answers, and your lack of concern for your customers,
> and shove it!
> I know this has been an issue with Service Packs on NT back to thebeginning
> of time, but due to the popularity of this software and the importance ofrestart. -
> XP-Sp2, I'd be inclined to think this is going to creep up more and more.
>
> Daemon Tools for mounting ISO's creates a device with a startup mode of
> [Boot] which cannot be stopped via device manager orWMI without a
> I'm surprised that normal in-use file methods(PendingFileRenameOperations)
> don't allow this filed to be updated with XP-SP2.
>
> Instead, the SP2 install fails on this file with no indication of how the
> user can identify why the file is in use or how to fix it.
>
> Respectfully submitted - not as a bug, but rather a 3rd party
> incompatibility/setup/user-experience concern.
>
> Dave Stafford
> d\a\v\e\@/s/t/a/f/f/o/r/d/./n/e/t
>
>
>I know this has been an issue with Service Packs on NT back to the
>beginning
> of time, but due to the popularity of this software and the importance of
> XP-Sp2, I'd be inclined to think this is going to creep up more and more.
>
> Daemon Tools for mounting ISO's creates a device with a startup mode of
> [Boot] which cannot be stopped via device manager orWMI without a
> restart. -
> I'm surprised that normal in-use file methods
> (PendingFileRenameOperations)
> don't allow this filed to be updated with XP-SP2.
>
> Instead, the SP2 install fails on this file with no indication of how the
> user can identify why the file is in use or how to fix it.
>
> Respectfully submitted - not as a bug, but rather a 3rd party
> incompatibility/setup/user-experience concern.
>
> Dave Stafford
> d\a\v\e\@/s/t/a/f/f/o/r/d/./n/e/t
>
>
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mandatory Integrity Control (MIC) tools? Biba tools? | Sharon2323 | Windows Vista Security | 1 | 08-04-2006 07:13 PM |
| New Vista ISO download after using Daemon Tools 4.03 for virtual d | mikepathome | Windows Vista Install & Setup | 1 | 06-11-2006 05:15 PM |
| Windows Vista Setup fails | Trotskyspal | Windows Vista Install & Setup | 1 | 06-10-2006 02:07 PM |
| Virtual CD program (daemon tools fails) | Deborggraeve Randy | Windows Vista Install & Setup | 0 | 03-04-2006 03:12 PM |
| atapi cdr not installing on XP | rick barnett | Windows XP Hardware | 0 | 07-06-2003 07:36 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |


Linear Mode


Posts: n/a