![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| OS: Vista 1) Two wireless network cards connected (both same make/model/driver Belkin Wireless G+ MIMO USB Adapter F5D9050UK) 2) Each connected to different G wireless network 3) Routes added: route -p add 216.196.109.131 mask 255.255.255.255 192.168.1.254 route -p add 216.196.109.144 mask 255.255.255.255 192.168.3.1 When download starts for 1st route at 20Mbits+, the second route (or any traffic going thru 2nd NIC) becomes extremely laggy and totally saturates the connections (high packetloss). When downloading stop at 1st NIC, 2nd NIC becomes responsive. And vice-versa when routes and network cards switched around. Why? Driver bug? Doesn't happen when using a Wired NIC and Wireless NIC. | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| <abadstate@googlemail.com> wrote in message news:ce1c1541-a9c3-4f30-a897-7ec5091385d6@d4g2000prg.googlegroups.com... Quote:
moving the antennas as far apart as possible, or orienting them at 90 degrees to each other and see if that helps. also put them on different channels, there are some channel combos that are better than others for preventing interference, i forget the best ones now but they are on the web somewhere. | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| On 4 Jan, 19:07, "Dave" <no...@nowhere.com> wrote: Quote:
30 cm apart before, now metre difference ![]() | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2 NICs | Payge | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 1 | 07-29-2007 02:53 PM |
| multiple NICs | justme | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 2 | 06-26-2007 12:08 AM |
| nonexisting NICs | Zbigniew Lisiecki | Windows XP Configuration & Management | 1 | 11-22-2004 05:17 PM |
| Can XP access two networks, using 2 nics??????? | Robert L [MS-MVP] | Windows XP Network & Web | 2 | 07-28-2003 06:01 PM |
| Dual NICs | David Mount | Windows XP Network & Web | 2 | 07-02-2003 06:33 PM |