Vista 5308 + VMWare

> Vista is always better to be run on a physical computer - however my
> experience would best advice you to go for Virtual Server 2005 R2 to run
> Vista in a virtual environment. However, if you want to use VMWare, use
> the Server product they ave available.
>
> --
> Zack Whittaker
> » ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
> » MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
> » Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
> » This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and
> not
> of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
> that up!
>
> --: Original message follows :--
> "Michael Luschas" <mluschas@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41CDF715-8694-47A2-B23E-126471D7FFBA@microsoft.com...

>> Hello,
>> Is it just me, or does Vista Install faster under VMWare ? The Host im
>> using is my computer + Server 2k3. I decided VMWare would be more sutable
>> for testing it, and apparently it is. I gave Vista 20 Gig HD space, and
>> 512MB Ram. I installed from my DVD, not an ISO and the install completed
>> in about 35 minutes (compared to my hour and a half normal system). Just
>> thought I'd ask anyone else if they had that happen.

>
>