![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| I bought my SonyVaio Notebook Computer (VGN-SZ57N, with 1GB of Ram) coming with an Vista Business installed, I can't work with its poor performance, so I bought / installed another new 4GB(2x2GB) Ram to replace the original 1GB of Ram(Product Spec. told that it support 4GB of Ram). As a result I realized both the Bios and Vista the OS seeing only 3GB(actually 3070MB) Physical Memory. I google around and I heard about Hardware's lacking of remapping feature and Software's 32 bit OS limitation issues, but I hope I still can hear someone here told me that this is an deadend for getting my current computer to see and work with 4GB of Ram. Please let me know whether this is a motherboard limitation or this is a matter of 32bit versions of Windows, any explaination... Thanks so much for your kindly help, I just felt sick of keeping search on this topic and I think I can accept all of this if this is a matter of time (People told me SP1 could solve all of this) or money (They told me I should upgrade to 64bit Vista Ultimate to work 4GB Ram). Hey, anyway thanks again, have a nice day. ![]() A. | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Asked and answered elsewhere. -- Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com * NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/ * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/ * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "ADO. Inconnu" <adoinconnu@gmail.com> wrote in message news:OISZKyULIHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #3 (permalink) | |
| On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:18:58 -0500, "Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote: Quote:
I have the same problem. Does anyone here have a real answer? Herman | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #4 (permalink) | ||
| Hi, Not to be rude, but this has been explained so many times it is nauseating. Please search this and other Vista groups before asking why: http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q...=2007&safe=off -- Best of Luck, Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/ Windows help - www.rickrogers.org My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com "Herman Klump" <hklumpe@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:2thgk3ldc5to4nnu6pdl0cbn8j2e7qsbkk@4ax.com... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #5 (permalink) | ||
| I have a real answer for you since you only posted your question in one single newsgroup. No 32-bit version of Windows will support 4gb of RAM, this is a design limitation inherent in all 32-bit Windows versions. A 64-bit version of Windows is necessary to overcome the limit. The other gentleman posted the same question in several newsgroups, which is rude and increases the workload for those who are volunteering their time to help out here, thus the reply to him. -- Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] rgharper@gmail.com * NEW! Catch my blog ... http://msmvps.com/blogs/rgharper/ * PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups * The Website - http://rgharper.mvps.org/ * HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm "Herman Klump" <hklumpe@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:2thgk3ldc5to4nnu6pdl0cbn8j2e7qsbkk@4ax.com... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| In message <9BC65D5D-22F3-44DF-85B8-B0CB7EE8401B@microsoft.com> "Richard G. Harper" <rgharper@email.com> wrote: Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #7 (permalink) | ||
| This has been "covered" numerous times - Vista 32 bit does support 4 gig RAM - it resrves "approximately" the "last" gig for specific resources such as video cards. Default Virtual Memory setting is 1.5 times installed RAM - checking Virtual Memory will show a default setting of 6 gigs when 4 gig RAM is installed. "DevilsPGD" <spam_narf_spam@crazyhat.net> wrote in message news:ldtjk39rrr2r7l18fts24htfn7uu3auukf@4ax.com... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #8 (permalink) | |||
| (Fixed topposting) In message <#PLxhb7LIHA.1168@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl> "AJR" <ajrjdr@comcast.net> wrote: Quote:
the address space reservations inherent to the x86 platform. | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 17:59:46 -0500, "AJR" <ajrjdr@comcast.net> wrote: Quote:
Sorry, this is not accurate. It uses " 'approximately' the 'last' gig" of the 4GB *address space*, not of RAM. The problem is that that last GB of address space is therefore not available to map RAM to. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Problems upgrading from Vista Home Basic to Vista Business | Guest | Windows Vista | 0 | 03-05-2008 02:20 PM |
| upgraded from Vista Home to Vista Business and now NIC gets 169 ad | Quentin | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 2 | 11-27-2007 03:20 PM |
| sharing files between Vista Business & Vista Home Premium | GeekforHire | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 1 | 07-03-2007 11:23 PM |
| Printer Sharing - Vista Home Preminum/Vista Business | Ernie | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 3 | 04-24-2007 03:03 PM |
| VISTA business does not recognize me as admin of the box | KevinHittle | Windows Vista Administration | 0 | 04-18-2007 04:24 PM |