![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| hi! I'm a web and graphic deisgner who's been "getting by" with XP Home now for a long time but as I already have a 64-bit laptop, I'm thinking I made the leap to something more powerful... especially as I've just set up a server with domain control that XP Home can't log-in to! Thing is, I'm wondering what to go for... get an OEM XP x64 Pro, wait for Vista x64 (when is vista due for general release by the way? and why is it taking so long for XP x64 Pro to go retail?) or just upgrade to XP Pro. If someone could let me know the advantages.disadvantages, costs, wait times, reliability etc. I'd be very grateful. Thanks My laptop is: Compaq R3479ea AMD Athlon 64 3400+ 2.2Ghz Processor 80GB HDD 512Mb Ram (soon to be 1GB) NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go 64M | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) |
| hi! I'm a web and graphic deisgner who's been "getting by" with XP Home now for a long time but as I already have a 64-bit laptop, I'm thinking I made the leap to something more powerful... especially as I've just set up a server with domain control that XP Home can't log-in to! Thing is, I'm wondering what to go for... get an OEM XP x64 Pro, wait for Vista x64 (when is vista due for general release by the way? and why is it taking so long for XP x64 Pro to go retail?) or just upgrade to XP Pro. If someone could let me know the advantages.disadvantages, costs, wait times, reliability etc. I'd be very grateful. Thanks My laptop is: Compaq R3479ea AMD Athlon 64 3400+ 2.2Ghz Processor 80GB HDD 512Mb Ram (soon to be 1GB) NVIDIA GeForce4 440 Go 64M | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #3 (permalink) |
| My personal views are (and much in the same situation as you describe in gist if not by specifics) Q: 64 bit OS A: Vista What development is there on the cards for XP 64 bit drivers if Vista 64 bit should command attention of the public? Q: application software A: I think this will be a natural consequence after Vista 64 bit becomes retailable Q: why 64 bit OS A: it has to happen sooner or later and my guess is that it will take 64 bit OSs into an even faster evolutionary cycle as external devices become more complex (in function if not in user interface) Q: what about the future A: interesting! (I'm glad you asked that question )If the next Mac OS lives up to some of the rumours on an intel platform it looks as if it will become a bit of a major challenge and appealing to computer savvy people Q: what next A: possibly a stronger separation of "home" users and "savvy" users where the discriminant is: I don't mind getting in there and sorting it out? | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Addendum: I think it is one reason why I'd rather "hire" an OS than "buy" an OS. For example I'd rather the OS informed me something along the lines of: Your usage patterns suggest the following components are advisable downloads... Rather than a finished retail product I think an OS should be evolutionary without undue consequence (gone are the days when all one wants is a stable platform for an office suite?) | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| There's just one little problem with that. You can't start a computer without an OS. So what is the first OS you hire? "deebs" <deebs@false.false> wrote in message news:eu2uSV%23uGHA.4436@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Answered in the other newsgroups you posted this same question in. "Maff" <Maff@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6A3C2B56-332B-4A26-AB7B-F9B88A8C5C1C@microsoft.com... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| A good question! I think the days of a one-size fits all OS are gone, dead, expired and zilched. User patterns require different ranges of functionality and packing 100% of that into a DVD seems a waste of time (to me). The OS has to be operationable or it isn't an OS? | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| I suggest to go for XP Pro 32 bits, unless you are very sure all your laptop components have the corresponding 64 bit device drivers. If it's the case, go for XP Pro 64 bit version. If you want to wait for Vista, it's the same thing, plus may be your favourites programs will never run on Vista, and you will need to get an upgrade for these products too. If security is your concern, then you can wait for Vista release, as I think Vista will be much more secure than XP Pro is at this time. About reliability, XP Pro is very reliable, and Vista will be too when shipped (Beta 2 is very buggy so far) Maff escribió: Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Vista UTP Question | KA Kueh | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 2 | 01-23-2008 05:23 PM |
| Vista backup question | 2112.snowdog@gmail.com | Windows Vista File Management | 0 | 12-10-2007 10:42 PM |
| Vista Authentication Question | JCO | Windows Vista Install & Setup | 9 | 12-01-2006 03:42 PM |
| PPC with Vista Question | fanki | Windows Vista | 0 | 06-15-2006 01:27 PM |
| Vista Beta2 Download Question - Vista B2.jpg (0/1) | 2 | Windows Vista | 2 | 06-08-2006 04:36 AM |