![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| What does Windows Defender really protects and scans for? Does Windows Defender protects against all the known virus, spyware & adware? That means I no longer need Norton or MacAfee or Micro Trend Antivirus? | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| "A.H." wrote: Quote:
spywares, it's always best to have multi-layered protection for your computer because Windows Defender (or any other anti-malicious-software tools out there) cannot detect threats every single time. ![]() Cheers. | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #3 (permalink) | ||
| "Max" <Max@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:6EDE60AF-D062-4EE7-8624-420919229833@microsoft.com... Quote:
best. These Anti-Virus programs takes up lots of programming powers. And at least I know of two, Micro Trend in particular, their Vista Anti-Virus program is itself defective. Micro Trend Anti-virus Program 2008 blocks Vista program menu change, even it you disable it. That means, even you delete program menu entries, it will keep coming back, in your next reboot. Also, it purposely sort your program menu, even if you re-order it. Our email questions to them went un-answered. | Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #4 (permalink) | |||
| "A.H." wrote: Quote:
got to suck, man.' I think they're going to fix it though, because there are going to be lots of people complaining about it, so most probably they'll release a fix or new version in early 2008 or something. Off-topic: [/ROBOT-TALK] I have not heard of Micro Trend before. [ROBOT-TALK] | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| It scans for Adware & Malware. You would need a separate Anti-Virus. A good free one is AVG Free. Defender works fine, but you may want to run a second anti-spyware program (Spybot, AdAware). You don't have to run them as realtime scanners. You can just run them as needed, probably once a week. -- Dustin Harper dharper@vistarip.com http://www.vistarip.com A.H. wrote: Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Another thing I like least of these Anti-Virus program is, they always seems to activate itself and starts scanning the most busy time when you need done something quick. Even if you turn off the scheduled scanning, but, you have NO option to turn off the self activated system scanning. This goes for McAfee and Micro Trend. We drop Norton years ago, because it failed to pick up all the sypware and adware - and require seperate packages. | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Another thing I like least of these Anti-Virus program is, they always seems to activate itself and starts scanning at the most busy time when you need to do something quick. Even if you turn off the scheduled scanning, but, you have NO option to turn off the self activated system scanning. This goes for McAfee and Micro Trend. We drop Norton years ago, because it failed to pick up all the sypware and adware - and require seperate packages. | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| http://www.spybot.info/en/index.html "Spybot Search and Destroy" is the proper name; "Spybot" is a trojan! Use the above link! For anti-virus, use Avast Free 4 Home. It is non-intrusive, and is not resource hungry. AND it works! Defender misses so, so much, and is a drag on your comp! "A.H." wrote: Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #9 (permalink) | ||
| On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 07:48:37 -0800, "A.H." <nospam@nospam.com> wrote: Quote:
No, not at all. Three points. 1. It protects against non-viral malware (spyware and adware) only. It provides *no* antivirus protection. 2. No such product, regardless of what kind or kinds of malware (viruses, trojans, worms, spyware, adware, etc.) it protects against, is perfect and nothing protects against "all the known" anythings. 3. Particularly when it comes to adware and spyware, no single product is anywhere near perfect. Note what Eric Howes, who has done extensive testing on Anti-Spyware products, states: "No single anti-spyware scanner removes everything. Even the best-performing anti-spyware scanner in these tests missed fully one quarter of the "critical" files and Registry entries" See http://spywarewarrior.com/asw-test-guide.htm You should run at least two anti-spyware products, not just Windows Defender. Quote:
No, it doesn't mean anything like that at all. You still need an anti-virus program (but preferably not Norton or McAfee, probably the two *worst* anti-virus programs). And you still need at least one other anti-spyware program. -- Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User Please Reply to the Newsgroup | Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| "Mick Murphy" wrote: Quote:
![]() | Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| WLAN 60 second scans | Adretheon | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 1 | 02-10-2008 09:17 AM |
| Error in Windows Vista Defender cant change anything in Defender! | Hans | Windows Vista Security | 1 | 06-23-2007 11:10 PM |
| new Command & Conquer 3 scans (PC) | AirRaid | Windows XP Games | 0 | 08-01-2006 07:02 PM |
| scans photos twice | Michael S | Windows XP Photos | 0 | 03-15-2006 04:57 AM |
| XP and scheduling virus scans | Shadow of James | Windows XP Basics | 0 | 08-13-2003 03:07 AM |