Windows update for RC1 bug ???

> The update system seems to work correct.
> I got a realtek hd audio update yesterday, so everything seems to work.
> Don't expect updates everyday... ;-)
>
> "Will Schuitman" <willsch@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:511FE65E-1F6E-42BD-8A3E-C4E43A2E2F66@microsoft.com...

>>I have had RC1 installed for almost a week now to be exact it was
>>installed on the 8th of this month.
>> As I'm aware this is beta software and it is to be expected that there
>> are a few bugs I usually make a point of it to check my update history on
>> a daily basis this gives me an idea of what issues are being addressed.
>> But since I have installed RC1 there have been no updates at all the only
>> updates that are in my update history are the updates that were installed
>> on the day I installed RC1 there are 4 updates all dated the 8th of this
>> month.
>> This seemed to be very strange seeing the beta2 release had upadtes
>> almost everyday (mainly definitions for defender)
>> So far I have only checked by clicking on "check for updates" to see if I
>> could manually retrieve any updates this process shows that the
>> connection to the server seems to work and no errors come up and finishes
>> with the notification saying "no updates available"
>> Can anybody confirm that there actually haven't been any updates since
>> the 8th ?
>> or is this a bug ?

>

>I have had RC1 installed for almost a week now to be exact it was installed
>on the 8th of this month.
> As I'm aware this is beta software and it is to be expected that there are
> a few bugs I usually make a point of it to check my update history on a
> daily basis this gives me an idea of what issues are being addressed.
> But since I have installed RC1 there have been no updates at all the only
> updates that are in my update history are the updates that were installed
> on the day I installed RC1 there are 4 updates all dated the 8th of this
> month.
> This seemed to be very strange seeing the beta2 release had upadtes almost
> everyday (mainly definitions for defender)
> So far I have only checked by clicking on "check for updates" to see if I
> could manually retrieve any updates this process shows that the connection
> to the server seems to work and no errors come up and finishes with the
> notification saying "no updates available"
> Can anybody confirm that there actually haven't been any updates since the
> 8th ?
> or is this a bug ?

> Will;
> Updates for a Microsoft Beta are not the norm.
> Other than Windows Defender. do not expect any.
> There will be the occasional exception, and they would probably be on
> Patch Tuesday (2nd Tuesday of each month), but don't expect them.
>
> Instead of updates, later builds cover existing issues.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
> http://www.dts-l.org
>
>
> "Will Schuitman" <willsch@bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
> news:511FE65E-1F6E-42BD-8A3E-C4E43A2E2F66@microsoft.com...

>>I have had RC1 installed for almost a week now to be exact it was
>>installed on the 8th of this month.
>> As I'm aware this is beta software and it is to be expected that there
>> are a few bugs I usually make a point of it to check my update history on
>> a daily basis this gives me an idea of what issues are being addressed.
>> But since I have installed RC1 there have been no updates at all the only
>> updates that are in my update history are the updates that were installed
>> on the day I installed RC1 there are 4 updates all dated the 8th of this
>> month.
>> This seemed to be very strange seeing the beta2 release had upadtes
>> almost everyday (mainly definitions for defender)
>> So far I have only checked by clicking on "check for updates" to see if I
>> could manually retrieve any updates this process shows that the
>> connection to the server seems to work and no errors come up and finishes
>> with the notification saying "no updates available"
>> Can anybody confirm that there actually haven't been any updates since
>> the 8th ?
>> or is this a bug ?

>
>

> Jupiter,
> That may be the case; mostly; but if you remember; MSFT did send
> patches on 5384; 5 or 6 of them; if I remember correctly.
> Later builds; also; to those not involved in the private beta; which is
> most people in here;basically means;; At RTM.
> lol
> Jeff

> Jeff;
> Most if not all of those patches were to test the Windows Update and had
> no substance.
> If Windows/Microsoft update offers patches for some, they are available
> for all regardless if they are CPP, Tech Beta etc.
> If an update is only for a specific group, that group will have a unique
> URL to access the updates.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
> http://www.dts-l.org
>
>
> "Jeff" <Jeff(alemaker)@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eL7Ley41GHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Jupiter,
>> That may be the case; mostly; but if you remember; MSFT did send
>> patches on 5384; 5 or 6 of them; if I remember correctly.
>> Later builds; also; to those not involved in the private beta; which is
>> most people in here;basically means;; At RTM.
>> lol
>> Jeff

>
>

> Jeff;
> Most if not all of those patches were to test the Windows Update and had
> no substance.
> If Windows/Microsoft update offers patches for some, they are available
> for all regardless if they are CPP, Tech Beta etc.
> If an update is only for a specific group, that group will have a unique
> URL to access the updates.
>
> --
> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
> http://www.dts-l.org
>
>
> "Jeff" <Jeff(alemaker)@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eL7Ley41GHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>> Jupiter,
>> That may be the case; mostly; but if you remember; MSFT did send
>> patches on 5384; 5 or 6 of them; if I remember correctly.
>> Later builds; also; to those not involved in the private beta; which is
>> most people in here;basically means;; At RTM.
>> lol
>> Jeff

>
>

> Jeff is correct. From this point on expect patches to come down to
> correct issues and provide driver refreshes as manufacturers respond to
> the automated error reporting system. There is very little time left for
> interim build releases to do these things. RTM is only six to eight weeks
> away.
>
> "Jupiter Jones [MVP]" <jones_jupiter@hotnomail.com> wrote in message
> news:uxpiOM51GHA.4632@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>> Jeff;
>> Most if not all of those patches were to test the Windows Update and had
>> no substance.
>> If Windows/Microsoft update offers patches for some, they are available
>> for all regardless if they are CPP, Tech Beta etc.
>> If an update is only for a specific group, that group will have a unique
>> URL to access the updates.
>>
>> --
>> Jupiter Jones [MVP]
>> http://www3.telus.net/dandemar
>> http://www.dts-l.org
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <Jeff(alemaker)@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:eL7Ley41GHA.1300@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

>>> Jupiter,
>>> That may be the case; mostly; but if you remember; MSFT did send
>>> patches on 5384; 5 or 6 of them; if I remember correctly.
>>> Later builds; also; to those not involved in the private beta; which is
>>> most people in here;basically means;; At RTM.
>>> lol
>>> Jeff

>>
>>

>
>