![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Dear Desktop Support Guru, I have joined Windows Vista 32 bit to a Windows 2003 Small business server domain that is running service pack 2. Since this time the PC has increased the time it takes to do things. For example, if the start button is clicked, you can wait for up to 60 seconds for the start menu to appear - and sometimes a not responding menu appears. Are there any known issues or tips and tweaks for this problem? The Vista machine is running a Pentium 3 (D) CPU with 1 GB of ram and the server is running a Pentium 3 (D) CPU with 2 GB of ram. The rest of the domain comprises 11 Windows XP service pack 2 PC's. Many thanks | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| "Justin" <Justin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news C852D59-8DBE-4BB2-9F27-647B3E512292@microsoft.com...Quote:
Is the Vista computer using the SBS Server for DNS and no other DNS servers? Are you using roaming profiles? -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User http://www.vistahelp.ca | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #3 (permalink) | ||
| Dear Kerry, I am using the Small business server for DNS, PDC and exchange. It services 12 PC's all of them being Windows XP SP2 except the Vista machine. I am running roaming profiles - but not on the Windows Vista PC. The machine has slow response times working locally - i.e when clicking the Start button. -- Desktop Support Guru "Kerry Brown" wrote: Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #4 (permalink) | |||
| Yes, but is the Vista client configured to use the SBS server for DNS? I have seen the exact symptoms you describe when the Vista client DNS settings were misconfigured. Please post the results of ipconfig /all from the Vista client. This may not be the cause in your case but we have to eliminate it first. -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User http://www.vistahelp.ca "Justin" <Justin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:E7CA3677-6162-4FD7-B171-73F1F228A238@microsoft.com... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #5 (permalink) | |||
| Dear Kerry, I ran an IPCONFIG /all and I get the following: Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : RAF.local Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) PRO/100 VE Network Connection Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-19-D1-59-CA-39 DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::c1c3:8c96:154e:9944%8(Preferred) IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.129(Preferred) Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:58:02 AM Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Wednesday, June 20, 2007 10:58:26 PM Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2 DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2 DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 201333201 DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.88 Primary WINS Server . . . . . . . : 192.168.0.88 NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled 192.168.0.2 is a Linux Firewall that provides ADSL internet access 192.168.0.88 is the 2003 Small business server. Many thanks! -- Desktop Support Guru "Kerry Brown" wrote: Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #6 (permalink) | |||
| The DNS is pointing to the Linux firewall before the SBS server. In Active Directory and particularly with SBS the all the AD clients should point only to the SBS server. With XP you can sometimes get away with the configuration you have. Vista doesn't like it all. All the computers in the SBS domain should be configured to use the SBS server for DNS. The SBS DNS server should be set up with forwarders to a couple of outside DNS servers. Try setting the Vista box to use only the SBS for DNS and see what happens. Personally I would reconfigure the DHCP server on the Linux firewall to do this for all the computers on the network. -- Kerry Brown Microsoft MVP - Shell/User http://www.vistahelp.ca "Justin" <Justin@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:815516B4-FCB3-49A7-85B5-A6CE859E9F6E@microsoft.com... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #7 (permalink) |
| I experience this problem also. I experience it particularly when I take an AD-joined laptop and carry it to another location, such as a friend's house or coffee shop. When I do this, and the provider (e.g. Comcast or T-Mobile, because I know the problems occur there) blocks port 445 outgoing, the symptoms will arise. In particular, any function that requires interaction with Explorer (.exe) will take 30-90 seconds to complete. This includes, for example, saving a downloaded file using Firefox. Because Firefox integrates with Explorer to save files (I think to render the icons), when I try to save a file using firefox in this environment, the download will block for 30-90 seconds before proceeding. It seems to be that Explorer is blocking to perform some sort of Active Directory action which requires port 445 (microsoft-ds) on which to communicate. Explorer resolves a name for the AD action but must wait for the TCP timeout to occur before returning control to the calling application. I don't use isolated DNS, so my Active Directory DNS is visible from any host on the Internet. I can see in other deployments why this symptom would not arise -- because if the DNS were isolated, the host would not have an AD server to attempt a connection, and thus would not have to wait for the TCP timeout. I would not be feasible for me to put an AD server at every location, because I have about 2 PCs per location, so it's also difficult for me to isolate the DNS. This problem occurs with or without roaming profiles. It occurs on brand new Vista machines recently joined to the domain. This problem also exhibited itself to a lesser degree in Windows XP. One work-around that often works is to establish a VPN connection to one of the domain controllers. In this way, microsoft-ds traffic can pass unobstructed, and the problem goes away immediately. Unfortunately, it's cumbersome to instruct other users to establish a VPN connection to keep their machine from becoming non-responsive. This to me is clearly a design flaw or design oversight, or possibly just an unsupported configuration. I would very much appreciate any suggestions for alleviating this problem. I'm also happy to provide additional details if a Microsoft rep takes interest in reproducing the problem. Sincerely, Jason R. Coombs | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Joining Vista Home Basic to a Domain | Joe | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 4 | 10-05-2007 07:08 PM |
| Disable Windows Firewall when first joining Vista to an Ad domain | Edward Ray | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 2 | 02-28-2007 01:57 AM |
| Joining Vista Ultimate to a Windows 2000 Domain | Kyle | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 3 | 02-22-2007 11:41 PM |
| Joining Win2003 Domain from Vista Pre-RC1 (5536) | Brian Kramer | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 1 | 09-12-2006 10:17 PM |
| Vista Beta 2 and joining Win2k3 domain problem | Jamie | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 6 | 06-08-2006 03:16 PM |