![]() |
| |||||||
| Notices |
![]() |
| LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Despite Windows Vista Ultimate claims to combine home and business editions of the operating system, you should take note that that sentence is vague. Business what? Business or Business Enterprise? Since Business Enterprise is a volume-license exclusive product. Its features are most likely not included in Windows Vista Ultimate. That is, only the Business edition is included and not Business Enterprise. As a result, Windows Vista Ultimate will not include things like MUI, Virtual PC Express, and other corporate features. Note that this is speculation but this seems likely, based on past trends of Microsoft. Feel free to share your opinion... | Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Hi, I have only one thing to add - it will be very difficult and smart to tell the difference between "home" and "business" for the following reasons: (1) Many people are starting out from home-based business, so it is a home or business? (2) Many people do work at home for unfinished business works, and it that sense, they all needed business-related networking and so on functions, so it is a home or business? (3) Many business people do wish to have fun once a while on the games and multimedia things, so is it a home or business? Personally, I can "understand" why product providers wish to "distinguish" their products for different segments. On the other hand, one should not do it in a way for people to think their products differentiations are "stuxxd" and annoying. Windows XP is easy to tell the difference although taking off some networking from home edition is not so smart. With so many new editions and have not seen any real useful features for "business" other than security (which is a basic requirement, and now becomes a "feature") and so-called 64-bit advantage (which only interests engineers). The final decision can be very simple - let's skip the confusion and let MS figure it out first before we migrating to the new OS. <Nicholas> wrote in message news:%23NIcRMCQGHA.5900@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #3 (permalink) | ||
| I'd like to add something else. I'm an owner of a small business, and our company uses hosting services and Windows XP Pro and one Windows 2003 standard. We are too poor to hire a full-time technical staff so we are either outsourcing more difficult works (such as web site, e-mail, transactions, etc.) to hosting service providers or trying to do ourselves. I travel a lot to Asia and Europe (I'm writing this in Paris now). Before knowing how to use Remote Desktop, I have to constantly synchronize files between my primary notebook and the backup desktop at the office and the one used at home before leaving for a business trip. Now I know how to use Remote Desktop, so I don't have to synchronize files that often (other than for backup) but I have to ensure the rest two PCs are always on during my trip, just in case I need something from any of them. We have tried to establish VPN connections, but no luck and it's too difficult for us. Besides, I wish the PCs are on only when I needed it - that means to use Wake-On-LAN or whatever means to wake it up. I don't think the above scenario is a "rare" case, but I found no one-step solution from anywhere. And most cases I studied from the net are failed cases, except of course, you have enough cash to spend on some "advanced" systems and OS. I am totally disappointed about the "features" of the new operating system and I don't see why can't it address some basic "file sharing" functions first before getting into fancy UI stuffs. Other than above mentioned features, I am satisfied with the current XP Pro. This is the first time that I have absolutely no feelings about the new release. And people around me all agree with what I have shared. The sales of the new OS, I guess, will depend on the new systems. I understand MS is monitoring messages here, so I'd like people from the company read the above and report back how terrible you have addressed the real fundamental "business" needs. "xfile" <cou-cou@remove.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%23HjdXHEQGHA.5152@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| xfile wrote: Quote:
surely be possible now that Vista is locale-neutral (ie English has to be added to the base neutral product). Students, business-people, and migrants can absolutely use MUI functionality in Windows and Office. Retail versions of any UI language should be available for anyone, anywhere in the world. If you've ever moved to a new country or had to buy/repair a laptop/tablet while travelling O/S on business it's a nightmare trying to source the correct language SKU for your needs. Mike (also in Paris) | Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #5 (permalink) | ||
| Agree 100% and couldn't be more. Once a while (such as now), I will help relatives and friends here (or other areas) to maintain their systems (not a technical support job but just a personal favor), and in too many cases, I have to "guess" what is the UI on the local system. In most cases, I could get it right since the arrangements of the options are similar, and in other cases, I could click the wrong option or had to ask them to explain to me in great details. I totally agree multi-language is a basic requirement for modern OS and business applications (such as Office). Truly hope the company can focus more on the needs of "real business persons and organizations" which using its own term - knowledge workers, and less on "technology advancements". Technology is worthless if it can't solve basic problems. "Mike Williams" <mikew@NOTANMVPmvps.org.invalid> wrote in message news:440AC9D0.5020902@NOTANMVPmvps.org.invalid... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Windows Vista Ultimate will combine all the features Microsofts Consumer and Business operatings. In fact Microsoft is toting Windows Vista Ultimate as a workaround for companies that do not want join Microsofts Enterprise Agreement or Software Assurance programs to receive the enterprise features. Windows Vista Ultimate will indeed include Virtual PC Express. Remember, Vista is devided into two branches: Consumer Home Basic Home Premium Business Business Enterprise A superset of all of these which you would describe as a no compromise operating system, Ultimate gives you best of both worlds. The difference in Enterprise for example though is that in case of features such as Virtual PC Express, you are allowed under the Enterprise Agreement to run a second instance of the operating system and additional copy of Virtual PC Express. But for Ultimate, you have purchase additional licenses. -- -- Andre Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta <Nicholas> wrote in message news:%23NIcRMCQGHA.5900@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| This blog post might interest you: http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/index.php?p=2649 Virtual PC Express licensing policies in Windows Vista -- -- Andre Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta <Nicholas> wrote in message news:%23NIcRMCQGHA.5900@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |
|
| | #8 (permalink) | ||
| And what about MUI? "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote: Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
| | #9 (permalink) | |||
| As for as I know, thats a feature specific to Vista Enterprise since its targetted at Company's with multi-ligual employees, sites that span the globe (sounds commericial doesn't it?) There will be minor, minuses to Ultimate of course, things like purchasing additional license compared to Enterprise editions option to install on a second partition. Its really confusing right now, lets wait a little more to get some more concrete information on included features and licensing. -- -- Andre Windows Connect | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta "Eric" <Eric@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:B0B1B6F7-DF74-44A0-A3CC-3E4504802A30@microsoft.com... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| |||
|
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| Sounds like a well trained sales ![]() "Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:%23GJx8bHQGHA.4108@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl... Quote:
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| ||
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| None |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Still can't connect to WPA Enterprise | Costanza | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 19 | 10-07-2006 08:00 PM |
| vista ultimate - july ctp | Param | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 0 | 07-22-2006 03:11 PM |
| Vista Beta 2 Ultimate Edition w/o Glass? | George Spiro | Windows Vista Install & Setup | 17 | 07-03-2006 02:25 PM |
| WPA Enterprise TKP connection problem | Costanza | Windows Vista Networking & Sharing | 1 | 06-14-2006 11:30 AM |