Wow, I can't believe MS is being so generous.

<no sarcasm> Really, for a beta that doesn't expire til May 31, 2007, that's
pretty darn good for an MS product. <sarcasm on> Ok, Apple Cores and
LinuxGearheads, jump over my post. YOU know you WANT to!

Its still in development, we have RC1 and then RTM.
--
--
Andre
Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta

"Peter M" <murkyness@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
news:%23tFy2sDjGHA.3588@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> <no sarcasm> Really, for a beta that doesn't expire til May 31, 2007,
> that's pretty darn good for an MS product. <sarcasm on> Ok, Apple Cores
> and LinuxGearheads, jump over my post. YOU know you WANT to!

Because they know that there will be no way you'd be running a beta with RC1
out...

Of course, if the finished product is better than this (it will be), then
I'll be first in line to buy it.

Dustin Harper



"Peter M" <murkyness@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
news:%23tFy2sDjGHA.3588@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> <no sarcasm> Really, for a beta that doesn't expire til May 31, 2007,
> that's pretty darn good for an MS product. <sarcasm on> Ok, Apple Cores
> and LinuxGearheads, jump over my post. YOU know you WANT to!

But there are builds before that - to us technical testers Andre - 2-3 weeks
max.

--
Zack Whittaker
» ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
» MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
» Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
that up!

--: Original message follows :--
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" <andred25@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:egRm1$DjGHA.5036@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Its still in development, we have RC1 and then RTM.
> --
> --
> Andre
> Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com
> Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com
> Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre
> http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
>
> "Peter M" <murkyness@cogeco.ca> wrote in message
> news:%23tFy2sDjGHA.3588@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>
>

Peter M wrote:

> <no sarcasm> Really, for a beta that doesn't expire til May 31, 2007,
> that's pretty darn good for an MS product. <sarcasm on> Ok, Apple
> Cores and LinuxGearheads, jump over my post. YOU know you WANT to!

The company is getting older and the product cycle is slowed .. a year isn't
that long anymore. Besides, Vista probably will RTM late Novemeber and be
publically released in January so most whoever's running the Beta will
probably want the fixed code.

> The company is getting older and the product cycle is slowed .. a year

> isn't that long anymore. Besides, Vista probably will RTM late Novemeber
> and be publically released in January so most whoever's running the Beta
> will probably want the fixed code.

That's exactly the plan ;o)

--
Zack Whittaker
» ZackNET Enterprises: www.zacknet.co.uk
» MSBlog on ResDev: www.msblog.org
» Vista Knowledge Base: www.vistabase.co.uk
» This mailing is provided "as is" with no warranties, and confers no
rights. All opinions expressed are those of myself unless stated so, and not
of my employer, best friend, Ghandi, my mother or my cat. Glad we cleared
that up!

--: Original message follows :--
"Newf gone Ont" <guppy@yup.yowza> wrote in message
news:uQwPYjIjGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl...

> Peter M wrote:

>
> The company is getting older and the product cycle is slowed .. a year
> isn't that long anymore. Besides, Vista probably will RTM late Novemeber
> and be publically released in January so most whoever's running the Beta
> will probably want the fixed code.
>